Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 45 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />recycled tertiary treated wastewater could be used without negatively impacting groundwater. <br />Proposed Housing Element Program 4.4 requires the City to assess and plan for adequate water <br />supply, including completion of groundwater treatment improvements to address known <br />contaminants in City-operated wells. The Municipal Code contains rules and regulations to maximize <br />infiltration and rainwater retention and minimize impacts to groundwater recharge. Section 9.30.060 <br />(Stages for reduction in water use) provides both voluntary and mandatory water conservation <br />stages to minimize the effect of a shortage of water on the City’s customers and significantly reduce <br />the consumption of water over an extended period of time, which directly impacts groundwater <br />supplies. (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.9-29–30). <br />Potential Effect <br />Impact HYD-3: Development consistent with the Housing Element Update, rezonings, and General <br />and Specific Plan Amendments would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site <br />or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of <br />impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: <br />i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; <br />ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result <br />in flooding on- or off-site; <br />iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; <br />iv) Impeded or redirect flood flows (Draft Program EIR, Page 3.9-31). <br /> <br />Findings: Less than significant impact. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: Erosion and Siltation: Construction activities at the site that would <br />disturb one or more acres of land surface are subject to the Construction General Permit adopted by <br />the State Water Board. Compliance with the permit requires each qualifying development project to <br />file an NOI with the State Water Board. Permit conditions require development of a SWPPP. <br />Inspection of construction sites before and after storms is also required to identify stormwater <br />discharge from the construction activity and to identify and implement erosion controls, where <br />necessary. Because these provisions are more stringent than those included in the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan, they would ensure that development on Site 27 (PUSD-Vineyard) would be <br />consistent with the “Water Quality and Protection Requirements Relating to Construction” included <br />in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. <br />The General Plan includes policies and actions that promote the prevention of erosion and siltation. <br />Water Element Program 2.2 requires compliance with Zone 7 policies regarding the restoration of <br />riparian corridors when flood and erosion control activities require channelization. Program 2.3 <br />directs the utilization of habitat preservation and reclamation measures when designing flood and <br />erosion control projects to limit impacts on plants and wildlife. Further, Program 11.8 requires <br />construction site field inspections to ensure proper erosion prevention and materials/waste <br />management implementation to effectively prohibit non-stormwater discharges.