Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 17 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />contribution to these less than significant cumulative impacts would not be significant with <br />implementation of the policies and programs described above and incorporation of MM BIO-1. <br />Sensitive Natural Communities or Riparian Habitat: There are several areas within the cumulative <br />geographic scope in which development could result in potential impacts to sensitive natural <br />communities and riparian habitat. However, development within the cumulative geographic context <br />would be required to comply with federal, State, and local laws and policies and all applicable <br />permitting requirements of the regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential <br />impacts on sensitive natural communities or riparian habitat, as well as the overall land use vision of <br />the applicable jurisdictions, including review for conformance with Objective Design Standards and <br />policies in local and regional plans. The Housing Element Update’s incremental contribution to these <br />less than significant cumulative impacts would not be significant with implementation of the policies <br />and programs included in the General Plan, such as Policies 1 and 3 of Goal 2, Program 1.6, Program <br />1.12, Program 6.4 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan, as well as <br />applicable policies of Chapter 8, Water Element, of the General Plan. <br />Waters of the United States and Wetlands: Development within the cumulative geographic context <br />would be required to comply with federal, State, and local laws and policies and all applicable <br />permitting requirements of the regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential <br />impacts on waters of the United States and wetlands. If, through the design process, it is determined <br />that a future development project cannot avoid a wetland or jurisdictional water, then the USACE <br />and/or RWQCB would require that there be an equal amount of wetland created elsewhere to <br />mitigate any loss of wetland. The Housing Element Update’s incremental contribution to these less <br />than significant cumulative impacts would not be significant with implementation of the policies and <br />programs in the General Plan, as well as MM BIO-1. As analyzed above, the Housing Element Update <br />would comply with federal, State, and local laws and policies and all applicable permitting <br />requirements of the regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential impacts on <br />waters of the United States and wetlands, including Section 404 and 401 of the CWA, and MM BIO-1. <br />Fish and Wildlife Movement Corridors: Future development would be required to comply with <br />federal, State, and local laws and policies and all applicable permitting requirements of the <br />regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential impacts on fish and wildlife <br />movement corridors. The Housing Element Update’s incremental contribution to these less than <br />significant cumulative impacts would not be significant with implementation of the policies and <br />programs included in the General Plan as well as MM BIO-1. As analyzed above, General Plan policies <br />and programs, such as Policy 1 and Policy 2 and Program 1.1-1.6, Program 2.1, and Program 2.2 of <br />Chapter 7, Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan would ensure that habitats <br />important to migratory wildlife such as creeks, parks, open space, and saltmarshes would not be <br />adversely impacted without adequate measures put in place to offset any potential impacts that may <br />result from future development. <br />Local Policies or Ordinances: Development within the cumulative geographic context would be <br />required to comply with local laws and policies and all applicable permitting requirements of the <br />regulatory and oversight agencies intended to address potential impacts on biological resources. <br />Other similar projects in the geographic area considered for the cumulative impact analysis would