02 ATTACHMENT 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update Errata Final EIR 3-22 FirstCarbon Solutions https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/EIR/4 - Final EIR/21480022 Sec03-00 Errata.docx are within PUD district, and as part of the Housing Element Update, the potential sites for rezoning would be rezoned to allow for residential development under a PUD district. To the extent projects may be subject to review through the PUD process, the PUD zoning would provide flexibility in residential development standards and housing types and reviewed in accordance with Objective Design Standards currently under development by the City, in alignment with the applicable objective design standards established by the City with the intent of ensuring such projects are developed in a manner that meets desired community character and are compatible with existing development. Pages 3.10-13 and 3.10-14; Last Paragraph on Page 3.10-13 and First Paragraph on Page 3.10- 14 To provide clarification, the following paragraph has been revised: The Housing Element Update includes policies and programs that are meant to ensure logical and orderly development and require discretionary review consistent with the Pleasanton Zoning Ordinance. For instance, Policy 4.1 of the Housing Element Update would result in the development of guidelines and standards for residential and mixed-use development that would incorporate objective standards Objective Design Standards whenever possible which would ensure one set of objective standards Objective Design Standards used to evaluate all projects (Program 4.2). With respect to the sites zoned for densities above 30 du/acre, which includes the Dublin-Pleasanton BART station property, Policy 6.1 requires those properties to be dispersed throughout the community. As described in Chapter 2, Project Description, the potential sites for rezoning were chosen based on seven criteria, and as shown in Exhibit 2-3, the high-density sites are dispersed throughout the city, consistent with Policy 6.1. Program 6.1 requires the City to adopt Objective and Design and Development Standards that would ensure that properties are developed at appropriate height limits, with compatible FARs, setbacks, massing, open space and parking requirements, and also includes approval criteria to ensure that projects can achieve their assigned densities while mitigating potential incompatibilities between those higher density projects and adjacent uses by implementing standards such as height limits, FAR, setbacks, massing, and open space. This would ensure that high-density projects are compatible with existing development. Moreover, as the City receives development applications for subsequent development consistent with the Housing Element Update, those applications would be reviewed by the City for compliance with the goals, policies, and programs of the Municipal Code. Page 3.10-14, Third Full Paragraph In response to FOOTHILL-4, the following paragraph has been revised: Urban Growth Boundary (Measure FF) All the potential sites for housing are within the UGB apart from Site 22 (Merritt) Site 1 (Lester). The eastern half of Site 22 (Merritt) Site 1 (Lester) is within the UGB while the western half lies just outside the UGB. Pursuant to Policy 22 of Chapter 2, Land Use Element, of the General Plan, no development within this site would occur beyond the UGB. Once the