My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
03 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:44:45 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:19:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
03
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />6 of 7 <br />Note that any other relevant objective standards included in the PMC (e.g., height and setback <br />standards as specified in the underlying zoning district, parking requirements, permitted and <br />conditionally permitted uses, water-efficient landscaping, signage, etc. would also continue to <br />apply to residential and mixed-use development projects. <br />Introduction <br />The Introduction identifies that the purpose of the standards and guidelines is for residential <br />development and mixed-use development that includes residential and references the vision <br />statement from the Downtown Specific Plan. <br />General development standards <br />This section includes frontage improvements standards and site standards for downtown sites. <br />Site design and planning standards <br />This section identifies site circulation, building orientation, standards for: alleys, paseos, <br />vehicular and bike parking, landscape, site lighting, and utility and service area location/design. <br />Architectural features <br />The Architectural Features section identifies standards for building massing, façade design <br />and projections, roofs and parapets, active frontage design, building entries, historic buildings, <br />materials and details, and building signage. <br />New” Standards <br />Although many of the draft objective standards for the R-M, C-C, and M-U District sites have <br />been incorporated from the other documents referenced above, there are some new standards <br />included to augment and bolster the body of regulations in key areas. A number of these <br />reflect similar standards included in the Draft Objective Standards for Housing Sites, because <br />they reflect principles of good design in multi-family development more generally: <br />Vehicular and bike parking (Draft Standards 5.2 and 5.13): a standard to set maximum <br />height of partially subgrade parking; and a standard to provide a pedestrian connection <br />between front doors of ground floor businesses in mixed-use buildings and rear parking <br />lots. <br />Landscape (Draft Standard B6.5): a standard to provide a landscape buffer for a <br />required pedestrian path between a mixed-use development and rear parking. <br />Building massing (Draft Standards C1.1 , C1.3, and C1.6): a standard to require building <br />massing breaks but modified compared to the Housing Sites ODS to account for the <br />smaller lot size (and therefore smaller projects) downtown and on R-M, M-U, and C-C <br />District sites. Another standard that is currently in the municipal code for R-M District <br />sites would apply to multifamily residential projects in M-U and C-C Districts as well; this <br />standard requires that a new structure proposed adjacent to an existing residential <br />development set back portions of its massing taller than 15 feet such that these portions <br />are further from adjacent residential development. Also, Draft Standard C1.6 would <br />require façade articulation for sites along Main Street to allow for greater flexibility and <br />encourage arcade sidewalks. <br />Roofs/parapets (Draft Standard C3.2): a standard to provide massing reduction through <br />roof design between new and existing single-family development or a zone where <br />single-family use is a permitted use. The roof design would be required to incorporate a <br />hipped roof, occupiable roof dormers, small gables that extend building massing to the <br />roof plane, and usable balconies recessed into the building massing.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.