Laserfiche WebLink
approximately three acres of land per parcel. This allocation does not include the <br /> application of the State Density Bonus, which could increase the total unit count <br /> by up to 50 percent, to a range of 1,350 to 2,160 units. <br /> • Vision Statement: The Vision Statement includes concepts such as Stoneridge': <br /> (1) continuing to be a community destination and a strong economic contributor; <br /> (2) evolving to be a vibrant mixed-use community with a variety of land uses that <br /> are integrated and well-connected with a multi-modal circulation system, and (3) <br /> including public and private gathering spaces and placemaking amenities. <br /> • Guiding Principles: The Guiding Principles include concepts related to the <br /> long-term economic viability of the site; both a community and regional <br /> destination; a center for job opportunities and other economic contributions; the <br /> integration of a variety of land uses; well-planned pedestrian, bicycle, and <br /> vehicular circulation; integrated and connected neighborhoods; an area for <br /> community gathering and civic opportunities; an integrated parking system; <br /> equitable distribution of affordable housing among the landowners; future land <br /> use planning to include contemplation of uses and densities while recognizing <br /> economic market factors and private agreements; and the possibility for <br /> adjustments between land owners of, for example, property, housing units, <br /> location of public spaces. <br /> January 11, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting <br /> The Planning Commission at its January 11, 2023, meeting, by a four-zero (4-0) vote, <br /> recommended the City Council adopt the Stoneridge Mall Framework Components, <br /> attached to this report as Attachment 1 (see below for information on minor revisions <br /> that staff incorporated into the Framework Components after the January Planning <br /> Commission meeting). <br /> Several members of the public at the meeting commented, noting concerns about the <br /> cost and feasibility of the projects, particularly when the Objective Design Standards are <br /> applied, and schools, traffic, and other environmental impacts that will result from <br /> development at the mall. One commenter also encouraged collaboration with the <br /> property owners. <br /> Property owners that provided feedback to the Commission expressed general support <br /> for the Framework and endorsed the planning process for the mall; however, some <br /> expressed concerns regarding the design principles, in particular that principles some <br /> appeared to be too detailed for this early planning phase. Some owners also expressed <br /> a desire to work among themselves and provide a proposal to the City for consideration. <br /> Owners emphasized that adequate density on the site, along with appropriate <br /> development standards and flexibility, were all important concepts and did not express <br /> objections to the housing allocation as proposed for the 6th Cycle Housing Element. <br /> The Commission as a whole was supportive of the housing density range of 50 to 65 <br /> du/ac as outlined in the Framework, although one commissioner suggested a range of <br /> The language used by the three ownership entities uses the term, "Stoneridge," in acknowledgement <br /> that future uses at the Mall area will be more varied than the only commercial uses that exist today. <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br />