My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
4_Exhibit B
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
01-11
>
4_Exhibit B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2023 4:11:46 PM
Creation date
1/5/2023 4:08:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
4
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\01-11
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
562
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
25 <br /> <br />990052\01\3407083.1 <br />Government Code Provision Housing Element Compliance <br />or before December 31, 2027, which report shall address the subsequent four years of the <br />housing element cycle and the cycle as a whole. The reports shall be provided consistent <br />with the requirements of Section 9795. <br />(f) A jurisdiction shall be considered metropolitan if the jurisdiction does not meet the <br />requirements for “suburban area” above and is located in an MSA of 2,000,000 or greater <br />in population, unless that jurisdiction’s population is less than 25,000 in which case it <br />shall be considered suburban. <br />(g)(1) For sites described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) [non-vacant sites], the city <br />or county shall specify the additional development potential for each site within the <br />planning period and shall provide an explanation of the methodology used to determine <br />the development potential. <br />Appendix B: Sites Inventory & <br />Methodology <br />• Section B.2.4: Methodology <br />• Section B.2.5: Suitability of <br />Nonvacant Sites <br />(g)(1) The methodology shall consider factors including the extent to which existing uses <br />may constitute an impediment to additional residential development, <br />Appendix B: Sites Inventory & <br />Methodology <br />• Section B.2.4: Methodology <br />• Section B.2.5: Suitability of <br />Nonvacant Sites <br />(g)(1) the city’s or county’s past experience with converting existing uses to higher <br />density residential development, <br />Appendix B: Sites Inventory & <br />Methodology <br />• Section B.2.4: Methodology, <br />Phase 6 <br />• Section B.2.5: Suitability of <br />Nonvacant Sites <br />(g)(1) the current market demand for the existing use, Appendix B: Sites Inventory & <br />Methodology <br />• Section B.2.4: Methodology <br />• Section B.2.5: Suitability of <br />Nonvacant Sites <br />(g)(1) an analysis of any existing leases or other contracts that would perpetuate the <br />existing use or prevent redevelopment of the site for additional residential development, <br />Appendix B: Sites Inventory & <br />Methodology <br />• Section B.2.4: Methodology <br />• Section B.2.5: Suitability of <br />Nonvacant Sites
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.