My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22 ATTACHMENT 3-5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
122022
>
22 ATTACHMENT 3-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 12:37:27 PM
Creation date
12/16/2022 12:32:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/20/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
22
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Brown discussed the benefits of higher density providing amenities, located as far <br /> away from single family homes as possible. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if the lack of a grocery store near Stoneridge Mall would <br /> impact tax credits. Mr. Williams stated he would research and get back to the <br /> Commission. Ms. Clark discussed staffs consideration of housing sites for tax credits <br /> and site selection criteria. <br /> Commissioner Nibert mentioned the grocery store in a neighboring town and whether <br /> the tax credits would apply. Mr. Williams stated the determination was based on the <br /> proximity of the housing development to the amenity, irrespective of whether the <br /> amenity was located in the same jurisdiction. <br /> Commissioner Allen requested additional information on relative weight of tax credits. <br /> She asked the density 'sweet spot' for a five-acre site. Mr. Williams stated affordable <br /> housing for a family development usually had a threshold of 120-135 units as the <br /> maximum for the total size of the project, and higher density on smaller sites to make <br /> the project financially feasible. <br /> In responding to Mr. Williams' comments regarding six-story developments, <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if Mr. Williams thought six-story developments were <br /> appropriate for Pleasanton's smaller scale downtown. Mr. Williams discussed the <br /> downtown in Mountain View and floor area ratio restrictions. He discussed potential <br /> development in downtown Pleasanton and whether it could be four stories. Ms. Clark <br /> discussed the height limitations in the Downtown Specific Plan, and its very specific <br /> policies to limit heights to three stories or less. Commissioner Allen discussed a battle in <br /> the City of Livermore over a higher-density project on its Main Street. Mr. Williams <br /> discussed the San Rafael Downtown Specific Plan. He stated too low density should not <br /> be developed in certain areas, such as townhomes in a business park. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> There were no comments from the public. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Commissioner Nibert agreed that high density development would need to be around <br /> Stoneridge Mall and Hacienda and close to BART, to receive tax credits. He suggested <br /> creative solutions to attain the RHNA numbers. <br /> Commissioner Gaidos stated higher density was necessary to fulfill the State's <br /> requirements. <br /> Excerpt: Approved Planning Commission Minutes, September 8, 2021 Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.