3_Exhibits A-G - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton’s 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Draft Housing Element Page 3 November 14, 2022 Suitability of Nonvacant Sites: The element must include an analysis demonstrating the potential for redevelopment of nonvacant sites. The analysis shall consider factors including the extent to which existing uses may constitute an impediment to additional residential development, the City’s past experience with converting existing uses to higher density residential development, the current market demand for the existing use, an analysis of any existing leases or other contracts that would perpetuate the existing use or prevent redevelopment of the site for additional residential development, development trends, market conditions, and regulatory or other incentives or standards to encourage additional residential development on these sites. For example, the element lists various factors (e.g., age of structure, development capacity through density and FAR) utilized to indicate the potential for redevelopment in the planning period; however, it should support the validity of these factors. To support these factors, the element should evaluate development trends or recent experience in redevelopment relative to the factors. For example, the element could utilize Table B-9 (Development on Nonvacant Sites in the Tri-Valley) and list the values of the factors for prior uses. In addition, specific analysis and actions are necessary if the housing element relies upon nonvacant sites to accommodate more than 50 percent of the RHNA for lower- income households. For your information, the housing element must demonstrate existing uses are not an impediment to additional residential development and will likely discontinue in the planning period. Absent findings (e.g., adoption resolution) based on substantial evidence, the existing uses will be presumed to impede additional residential development and will not be utilized toward demonstrating adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA. Finally, the housing element must include a program to provide replacement housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g)(3).) The replacement housing program must adhere to the same requirements as set forth in Government Code section 65915, subdivision (c), paragraph (3). Large Sites: While the element states large sites will only use ten acres of buildable acreage to accommodate lower-income RHNA, it must still provide analysis regarding the development of housing for lower-income households on large sites where the acreage of the parcel exceeds ten acres. Absent sufficient evidence that sites of equivalent size with affordability were successfully developed during the planning prior planning period or other evidence that demonstrates the suitability of these sites, the large sites are deemed inadequate to accommodate housing for lower-income households. For example, the element should describe the characteristics of anticipated development on identified large sites, including opportunities and timing for specific-plan development, further subdivision, parceling, site planning or other methods to facilitate appropriately sized sites that encourage the development of housing affordable to lower-income households. Based on the outcomes of this analysis, the element should add or modify programs. Environmental Constraints: While the element provides information on general environmental constraints, it should also relate those constraints to identified sites, including a discussion of any other known conditions (e.g., shape, easements, contamination) and impacts on development in the planning period.