Laserfiche WebLink
land use pattern in the neighborhood and previously developed properties in the vicinity. <br />The subject lot is relatively flat with mature existing vegetation. An extensive landscape <br />plan including the replanting of fourteen 24 -inch box trees is proposed. As such, the City <br />Council finds the residence is sensitive to the existing trees and vegetation on-site. The <br />proposed site improvements relate well to the proposed residence as well as the existing <br />residence on-site that is being converted to an accessory dwelling unit. Outdoor space <br />will be accommodated with each unit and they both will relate well to the site's natural <br />and built features. The Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes into <br />account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with the best <br />engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooring, and to have as minimal <br />an effect upon the environment as possible. <br />The City Council finds that grading is kept to a minimum is only proposed for the building <br />pad and site improvements. A Geotechnical Report was provided by CalGeotech dated <br />"Received September 2, 2021" which analyzes the property and provides a number of <br />recommendations regarding site preparations, foundation design, and other pertinent <br />solutions. Ultimately, the report notes the site is suitable for the proposed residence. In <br />addition, the flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) <br />indicate that the subject property is not located in a flood hazard zone. Finally, dust <br />suppression measures will be required as a Condition of Approval. As such, the Council <br />concludes that this finding can be made. <br />5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been designed <br />and located in such a manner to complement the natural terrain and landscape. <br />The proposed project does not include the extension of any new public streets. The <br />subject lot is relatively flat and thus the proposed residence does not require extensive <br />grading and does not contrast the natural terrain. The City Council finds the proposal is <br />sensitive to existing landscaping, maintaining a majority of the mature vegetation on-site. <br />Given the proposed residences large setbacks, extensive landscaping, and articulated <br />building design the scale is appropriate. The architectural style and detailing of the <br />proposed residences are compatible with the existing neighborhood. As such, the <br />Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br />6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design <br />or the proposed development plan. <br />The City Council finds subject site has adequate turn -around area to serve fire trucks <br />which, as conditioned, must be maintained. The new homes will be equipped with <br />automatic residential fire sprinklers. In addition, the proposed homes will be required to <br />meet the requirements of applicable City and State codes. As such, the Council <br />concludes that this finding can be made. <br />7. Whether the proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD <br />district. <br />The City Council finds the proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the <br />PUD district including to allow residential uses on the lots. In addition, the intent is to <br />maintain adequate light, air, privacy, and separation between dwellings and requires <br />specific landscape, fencing, lighting, and other design requirements unique to the <br />district. The project will help implement the intent of the district through large setbacks, <br />extensive landscaping, and context sensitive building and site design. As such, the <br />Council concludes that this finding can be made. <br />