Laserfiche WebLink
Arborist Report. May 8, 2021. HortScience, Inc. <br />535 Sycamore Road. Davasam and Chekka. Page 1 <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction and Overview <br />Sunil Davasam and Nagaraj Chekka are planning to redevelop the subject property in <br />Pleasanton CA. Current site use consists of an abandoned residence and out-buildings. <br />Davasam and Chekka requested that HortScience, Inc. prepare an Arborist Report for <br />the site. This report provides the following information: <br /> <br />This report provides the following information: <br />1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees within the <br />proposed project area based on a visual inspection from the ground. <br />2. An assessment of the development impacts to the trees based on the drawings <br />provided by Davasam and Chekka. <br />3. Recommendations for action based on proposed project plans. <br />4. Guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction and maintenance <br />phases of development. <br />5. A Tree Assessment Form, providing a description of each tree and a Tree <br />Assessment Map showing the location of trees by tag number. <br /> <br />Assessment Methods <br />Trees were assessed in February 2018. The assessment included all trees 6” and larger <br />in diameter, within and adjacent to the proposed project area. The assessment <br />procedure consisted of the following steps: <br /> <br />1. Identifying the tree as to species; <br />2. Tagging each tree with a numerically coded metal tag and recording its <br />location on a map; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54” above grade; <br />4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 – 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of <br />disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. <br />4 - Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor <br />structural defects that could be corrected. <br />3 - Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, <br />thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that <br />might be mitigated with regular care. <br />2 - Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br />branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />1 - Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most <br />of foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be <br />abated. <br />5. Rating the suitability for preservation as ”high”, “moderate” or “low”. <br />Suitability for preservation considers the invasiveness of the species, health, <br />age and structural condition of the tree, and its potential to remain an asset <br />to the site. <br /> <br />Eight trees (valley oaks #54, 94, 96, 97, 97, 99, 100; coast redwood #90) appeared to be <br />located on adjacent properties but were included in the assessment because portions of <br />canopies extended into the development site. Valley oak #76 may be on the property <br />line. <br /> <br /> <br />