My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
110122
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2022 3:44:07 PM
Creation date
10/26/2022 3:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton 2022 Legislative Advocacy Outcomes <br /> Focus Area: Housing <br /> SB 6 (Caballero 0) Local planning: housing: commercial zones. <br /> The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long- <br /> term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its <br /> boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. Current law <br /> requires that the housing element include, among other things, an inventory of land suitable and <br /> available for residential development. If the inventory of sites does not identify adequate sites to <br /> accommodate the need for groups of all households pursuant to specified law, existing law <br /> requires the local government to rezone sites within specified time periods and that this <br /> rezoning accommodate 100% of the need for housing for very low and low-income households <br /> on sites that will be zoned to permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential use by <br /> right for specified developments. This bill, the Middle Class Housing Act of 2022, would deem a <br /> housing development project, as defined, an allowable use on a parcel that is within a zone <br /> where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use, if specified conditions are met, <br /> including requirements relating to density, public notice, comment, hearing, or other procedures, <br /> site location and size, consistency with sustainable community strategy or alternative plans, <br /> prevailing wage, and a skilled and trained workforce. <br /> Pleasanton Position: Oppose unless amended <br /> Focus Area: Housing <br /> AB 2295 (Bloom D) Local educational agencies: housing development <br /> projects. <br /> Would deem a housing development project an allowable use on any real property owned by a <br /> local educational agency, as defined, if the housing development satisfies certain conditions, <br /> including other local objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective <br /> design review standards, as described. The bill would deem a housing development that meets <br /> these requirements consistent, compliant, and in conformity with local development standards, <br /> zoning codes or maps, and the general plan. The bill, among other things, would authorize the <br /> land used for the development of the housing development to be jointly used or jointly occupied <br /> by the local educational agency and any other party,subject to specified requirements. The bill <br /> would exempt a housing development project subject to these provisions from various <br /> requirements regarding the disposal of surplus land. The bill would make these provisions <br /> effective on January 1, 2024, except that the bill would require the Department of Housing and <br /> Community Development to provide a specified notice to the planning agency of each county <br /> and city on or before January 31, 2023. The bill would repeal its provisions on January 1, 2033. <br /> Pleasanton Position: Oppose with Comments <br /> Focus Area: Housing <br /> AB 916 (Salas D) Zoning: bedroom addition. <br /> Would prohibit a city or county legislative body from adopting or enforcing an ordinance <br /> requiring a public hearing as a condition of reconfiguring existing space to increase the bedroom <br /> count within an existing dwelling unit. The bill would apply these provisions only to a permit <br /> application for no more than 2 additional bedrooms within an existing dwelling unit. The bill <br /> would specify that these provisions are not to be construed to prohibit a local agency from <br /> requiring a public hearing for a proposed project that would increase the number of dwelling <br /> units within an existing structure. The bill would include findings that ensuring adequate housing <br /> Wage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.