Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton 2022 Legislative Advocacy Outcomes <br /> AB 2536 (Grayson D) Development fees: impact fee nexus studies: connection fees <br /> and capacity charges. <br /> The Mitigation Fee Act requires a local agency that establishes, increases, or imposes a fee as <br /> a condition of approval of a development project to, among other things, determine a <br /> reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the <br /> fee is imposed. Current law requires a local agency that conducts an impact fee nexus study to <br /> follow certain standards and practices, as specified. Current law also requires a local agency to <br /> hold at least one open and public meeting prior to levying a new fee or service charge, as <br /> specified. This bill would require a local agency, prior to levying a new fee or capacity charge or <br /> approving an increase in an existing fee or capacity charge, to evaluate the amount of the fee or <br /> capacity charge. The bill would require the evaluation to include evidence to support that the fee <br /> or capacity charge does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing service, as <br /> specified. <br /> Pleasanton Position: Oppose <br /> Focus Area: Housing <br /> AB 2653 (Santiago D) Planning and Zoning Law: housing elements. <br /> Current law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for <br /> land use development within its boundaries that includes, among other things, a housing <br /> element. Current law requires the planning agency of a city or county to provide an annual <br /> report to the Department of Housing and Community Development by April 1 of each year that <br /> includes, among other information, a housing element portion that includes, as provided, the city <br /> or county's progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs and local efforts to remove <br /> governmental constraints on the maintenance, improvement,and development of housing, as <br /> specified; the net number of new units of housing; and data from a sample of projects, selected <br /> by the planning agency,that were approved to receive a density bonus from the city or county. <br /> This bill would require the planning agency to additionally include in its annual report the <br /> number of all new housing units, the number of housing units demolished, and data from all <br /> projects approved to receive a density bonus from the city or county, as specified. <br /> Pleasanton Position: Oppose <br /> Focus Area: Housing <br /> AB 2668 (Grayson, D) Planning and zoning. <br /> The Planning and Zoning Law, until January 1, 2026, authorizes a development proponent to <br /> submit an application for a multifamily housing development that is subject to a streamlined, <br /> ministerial approval process, as provided, and not subject to a conditional use permit, if the <br /> development satisfies specified objective planning standards. Current law specifies that a <br /> development is consistent with the objective planning standards if there is substantial evidence <br /> that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the development is consistent with the <br /> objective planning standards. This bill would clarify that a development subject to these <br /> provisions is subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process, and not subject to a <br /> conditional use permit or any other non-legislative discretionary approval. The bill would specify <br /> that a local government is required to approve a development if it determines that the <br /> development is consistent with objective planning standards, as specified. <br /> Pleasanton Position: Oppose <br /> 7IPage <br />