My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 04122022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 04122022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 4:36:45 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 4:36:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amenities included retaining existing trees, adding additional trees and shade structures, fitness <br /> equipment, and intergenerational games. <br /> Ms. Chavez reported the final conceptual plan is based on the Rise option but incorporated popular <br /> elements from the Pride option, including the addition of an accessible parking space, and shifting the <br /> Sunrise Plaza entrance. She advised the final concept enlarged the central play area, incorporated <br /> Concept 2's slow play area, and switched out the unpopular bird feature. She explained there is an <br /> addition of rocking benches per community feedback and the Concept 2 challenge course was added <br /> to the Concept 1 design in place of the climbing structure. She noted nature play was also added along <br /> with a small stage for performances, and lawn space for spontaneous activities. <br /> Landscape Architect Matt Gruber reported the Parks and Recreation Commission voted to adopt the <br /> proposed design, but expressed concerns about the $7.5 million estimated construction costs. Staff <br /> requests that the City Council review the proposed design and provide direction to staff on whether to <br /> proceed forward or pause due to a lack of funds. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Landscape Architect Gruber explained the cost of playground <br /> equipment is one of the unknowns along with construction cost contingencies. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Landscape Architect Gruber clarified the project was approved <br /> with $360,000 set aside for design but the total amount until the time of bidding will be $500,000, <br /> leaving a deficit of$140,000. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Landscape Architect Gruber clarified the project would have <br /> pathway safety lighting but not large overhead lighting. The intent is to have the park close at dusk. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant Director Crose reported there have been preliminary <br /> discussions about searching for grant funding. She confirmed there is presently no grant funding and <br /> the staff has not gone any further than the research phase. <br /> Councilmember Testa stressed the need for grants and sponsorships. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Assistant Director Crose clarified there was significant public input looking <br /> for having as much seating area as possible, leading to the creation of an accessible picnic area in the <br /> design. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Assistant Director Crose clarified there is a possibility of using money <br /> from the Public Art Fund for the installation of public art, independent of the playground costs. <br /> Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Assistant Director Crose advised her understanding is <br /> Pleasanton Unified School Districts (PUSD) playground is for a specific age range whereas the City's <br /> would be for all ages. Interim City Manager Brian Dolan noted it is a fraction of the size being proposed <br /> for Ken Mercer Sports Park. <br /> Councilmember Narum moved to approve the draft of the All-Abilities Playground Master Plan. <br /> Councilmember Arkin seconded the motion. <br /> Councilmember Narum liked many components of the project and noted it is a nice complement to the <br /> Sunflower Hill project. She advised costs are a concern and called to not spend any more money at this <br /> time, noting the equipment could be outdated in a couple of years when funding does exist. She <br /> commended RRM's design and the ability to phase construction. She encouraged searching for grants <br /> and opening a fund through the Three Valleys Community Foundation for residents to make donations. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 2 of 18 April 12, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.