My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
101822
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2022 4:51:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2022 4:49:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/18/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
10/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Caldwell agreement or unforeseen circumstances and related extra services as <br /> determined to be necessary by the City. This a new project and requires a Council <br /> appropriation of$363,755 from the Water Fund (420) fund balance in Fiscal Year 2022- <br /> 2023 to cover the costs. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> On September 6, 2022, the City Council authorized staff to suspend the PFAS <br /> Treatment and Wells Rehabilitation Project and to further evaluate water supply <br /> alternatives for the portion of water supply currently sourced via the City's groundwater <br /> pumping quota (3,500 acre-feet/year). The need to consider water supply alternatives is <br /> driven by the following factors: <br /> o The PFAS Treatment Project cost estimate has increased approximately 30 percent <br /> due to the impact of recent inflation trends on the bidding market. <br /> • The City currently does not own or operate a water treatment plant and the PFAS <br /> treatment facility will require additional staff and have significant annual operational <br /> costs for treatment media procurement and disposal. These are substantial long- <br /> term costs to be directed at only 20 percent of the city's water supply. <br /> • A changing regulatory environment will continue to add uncertainty and potential <br /> liability to the City as it will be responsible for contaminant removal from the water it <br /> produces. <br /> o Acceptable contaminant levels are declining and may require continual changes in <br /> treatment techniques and technologies to meet requirements. <br /> Given the increasing costs of PFAS treatment, regulatory uncertainty, and long-term <br /> operational commitments, it is prudent for the City to consider other water supply <br /> alternatives before proceeding with the PFAS Treatment project. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The proposed project would evaluate alternatives for the portion of water supply <br /> currently sourced via the City's groundwater pumping quota (3,500 acre-feet/year). Two <br /> categories of water supply alternatives will be considered: <br /> Category 1 —Alternatives that continue to utilize City's groundwater quota such as new <br /> City wells located in areas without PFAS or Zone 7 pumping groundwater on City's <br /> behalf. <br /> Category 2 —Alternatives that do not continue to utilize City's groundwater quota such <br /> as purchasing 100 percent of the needed water from Zone 7 or water purchases outside <br /> of Zone 7. <br /> The above are conceptual alternatives. Brown and Caldwell would develop a full list and <br /> then work with the City to rank and compare each alternative. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.