My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
071922
>
19 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 2:48:22 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 2:47:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
19
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\071922
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Squarespace <br /> To: Megan Campbell <br /> Subject: Form Submission - Provide comments <br /> Date: Tuesday,June 14,2022 6:49:14 PM <br /> Sent via form submission from Pleasanton Housing Element Update <br /> Name: Jill Buck <br /> Email <br /> Comment: Dear Ellen, Megan and Shweta; Thank you so much for all the hard work you are <br /> doing on the Housing Element! I just have a couple of continents I'd like to submit in writing: <br /> 1. I strongly believe that Pleasanton public schools graduate some of the most intelligent, <br /> capable and hardworking young people in the world. I believe they will do great things <br /> wherever they go. but Pleasanton will be great if they come home to live, work and play. I fear <br /> that we are exporting our City's future each year we fail to provide affordable housing options <br /> for the many Amador. Foothill and Village graduates who would love to come back to <br /> Pleasanton and have the requisite education to engage in our diverse and strong economy. I <br /> would love to see more residential options that are tailored to young people just beginning <br /> their careers in the area. and potentially some creative financing options for graduates of our <br /> high schools. I realize that this would require public-private partnerships. but I genuinely <br /> believe there are enterprises that would be willing to engage in those partnerships if the City <br /> signaled interest. 2. I am a stalwart supporter of the Climate Action Plan. but I do not favor its <br /> use as means to stall housing in any way. I do not favor any efforts to require the City to meet <br /> any tlu-eshold of GHG emissions before approving housing projects, and I do not favor <br /> restricting the personal freedoms of future homeowners based on the City's climate goals. I <br /> believe that with a combination of built-in infrastructure efficiencies and good-faith efforts on <br /> the part of ALL Pleasanton residents, we can meet our GHG emission reduction goals. <br /> Restrictions on private property. like owning a car, should not be conditions placed on new <br /> residents when existing residents are allowed these freedoms. I believe this would form <br /> inequities and dissent among residents that is needless. Thank you so much for your time and <br /> consideration, Jill Buck <br /> Does this submission look like spam? Report it here. <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.