My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
071922
>
19 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 2:48:22 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 2:47:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
19
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\071922
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Ellen Holmgren <br /> To: ;Mayor and City Council <br /> Cc: Pleasanton City Clerk;Ellen Clark;Meaan Campbell;Shweta Bonn;Sachiko Riddle;ElecJcv Hopkins'Steve <br /> Hernandez <br /> Subject: FW:March 15,2022 City Council Agenda Item 21 <br /> Date: Monday,March 14,2022 1:09:20 PM <br /> Dear Jeff Schroeder, <br /> Thank you for your email regarding Item 21 on the City Council Agenda for Tuesday, March <br /> 15, 2022. <br /> This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the Mayor and City Council, the Interim <br /> City Manager, and City staff. <br /> Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Regards, <br /> Ellen Holmgren, Administrative Assistant <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> From: Pleasanton City Clerk <br /> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 12:58 PM <br /> To: Ellen Holmgren <br /> Subject: FW: March 15, 2022 City Council Agenda Item 21 <br /> From:Jeff Schroeder <br /> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 12:09 PM <br /> To: Pleasanton City Clerk <br /> Subject: March 15, 2022 City Council Agenda Item 21 <br /> Dear Mayor and City Council Members: <br /> A few remarks regarding Housing Element Policies as discussed in the Staff Report: <br /> 1. LIHF expenditures: It is important to note that State Law requires that projects accepting <br /> public monies pay prevailing wages for the construction of affordable housing. This can easily <br /> add Thirty(30%) percent or more to the cost of the project so this expenditure should be <br /> made very judiciously if at all. These funds may be better spent providing assistance to home <br /> buyers, renter assistance, etc. <br /> a. Another way to capitalize on these fees would be to incentivize projects to go beyond <br /> the minimum requirement in the IZO by allowing them to receive IZO fee credits for <br /> units provided in excess of the requirement directly from another developer. This <br /> would prevent the City from having to receive the funds and create a public funding <br /> contribution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.