Laserfiche WebLink
February 9, 2022 <br /> Planning Commission <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> February 9 Meeting,Agenda Item 4 <br /> Dear Chairperson Chase and Planning Commissioners, <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to comment on new policies for the Housing Element update. I <br /> see that staff has done a thorough review of past policy decisions. First, let me say that I realize <br /> that neither you, nor the current staff,are the architects of a housing strategy past due for <br /> change. <br /> As a longtime advocate for affordable housing in Pleasanton, I believe you should evaluate the <br /> effectiveness of the City's past decisions in delivering what ABAG has defined as our "fair share" <br /> of housing. In terms of providing housing opportunities for the workforce employed in <br /> Pleasanton, the majority of whom earn less than 60% of the Area Median Income, past strategies <br /> have failed to address even a small percentage of the total need generated by Pleasanton based <br /> employers. Furthermore, new aspects of California housing law will now require Pleasanton to <br /> find a way to achieve RHNA assigned targets for ELI,VLI, LI, and MI housing if we wish to <br /> retain local control over project design and location. It's time for a fresh approach. Here are some <br /> suggestions to put Pleasanton in control going forward: <br /> Pursue an all nonprofit housing approach to balance Pleasanton's housing stock, and to bring our <br /> currently in-commuting workforce closer to their jobs. <br /> 1. Increase LIH fees for all new commercial development to the 2018 maximum, at least. <br /> Payment of the fee should provide an employee housing entitlement to the business <br /> and/or commercial property owner. Established businesses that paid the previous <br /> lower fee would also be allowed to buy in for employee housing entitlements. <br /> Nonprofit development could provide a tax benefit. Every new non-commuting <br /> employee could then also provide a share of carbon offsets value to the employer. <br /> 2. Refocus the IZO,which has produced 0 ELI units,very few VLI units,and only a few <br /> LI units at the upper end of the range. Allow market rate development to be 100% <br /> AMI in a range of sizes and prices. Or use the IZO exclusively to add units affordable <br /> at 80% to 100%AMI. Focus on climate friendly design. Include planning for luxury <br /> HDR condominium development. <br /> 3. For Pleasanton to have a density bonus incentive seems beside the point if we pursue <br /> the nonprofit development our current workforce situation requires. <br />