19 - Laserfiche WebLink

higher. The Commission expressed using priorities and incentives to motivate the creation of affordable units. There was some concern noted about the potential loss of light industrial/commercial uses like automotive if Site 11 (or similar sites) were to be rezoned, although it was also acknowledged that sites listed for potential rezoning from one use to another all come with some trade-offs. The sites will continue to be reviewed through the process and ultimately the final list selected will have to consider all the factors at play. The Commission discussed HCD's imminent review and the forthcoming CEQA analysis. Given these outstanding reviews, it did not recommend changes to the site list at this time, but rather suggested a review of the list at future meetings and adjustments at that time, as is recommended by staff. The Commission acknowledged the importance of the AFFH policies and programs and appreciated their inclusion. The Commission noted general support for the draft document and valued the analysis and adjustments made to the 5th Cycle Housing Element components that were carried forward. The Commission also found that the document incorporated much of the feedback received to date. Housing Commission Summary- June 23, 2022 The Housing Commission discussed the Draft Housing Element on June 23. The Commission discussed the distinction between the Housing Needs Assessment and the RHNA, and complimented the detailed report, particularly the robust quantitative data. The Commission inquired about the HCD approval process and lessons learned from jurisdictions in Southern California. The Commission reiterated the need for partnerships with employers and the need for starter homes, senior housing, and housing for veterans. Further the Commission inquired about and discussed housing for the local workforce. It was questioned if more of the Lower-Income Housing Fund (LIHF) could be used toward affordable housing production. It was also acknowledged that "affordable" housing in Pleasanton could be considered unaffordable for the rest of the state. A Commission member asked if additional sites could be added to the site list (e.g., the Remen tract and SteelWave properties); staff acknowledged the desire to add to the sites list but reminded the Commission that the draft sites inventory had already been reviewed by City Council and is currently undergoing environmental review. The Commission asked for a definition for Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) to be added to the draft document and discussed the difference between Single Room Occupancy (SRO) units and studio units. The Commission also emphasized that additional staff and funding would be necessary to implement the goals, policies, and programs in the document, and suggested more staff resources were needed to focus on the actual production of affordable housing units in Pleasanton. Page 13 of 18