CC MIN 01042022 - Laserfiche WebLink

MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 4. Public Comment regarding items not listed on the agenda John Heath, proponent of the Our Neighborhood Voices initiative, stated the initiative would give cities and counties the right to override conflicting statements in planning and zoning laws. He noted the initiative is an attempt to have the State government see its municipalities as collective partners. He encouraged residents to visit their website for additional information. Becky Dennis reported she will wait until the next meeting to discuss the Our Neighborhood Voices initiative. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Councilmember Arkin presented a tribute to the life and legacy of 50-year Pleasanton resident John Madden who passed away on December 28, 2021. The commendation recognized Mr. Madden's career, being a good friend and neighbor to the Pleasanton community, and his family's contributions to the Tri-Valley through investments in the arts and properties such as the Rose Hotel. 5. Public Hearing — Receive input from the community regarding boundaries and composition of districts to be established for City Councilmember district-based elections pursuant to Elections Code section 10010 City Attorney Dan Sodergren reported in September 2021, the City Council adopted a Letter of Intent to transition from at-large to district-based elections in conformance with the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) with the office of Mayor remaining an at-large election. He advised the City is required to hold meetings to gather community input before the maps are drawn and tonight represents the first of the two hearings. Demographer Michael Wagaman, Principal of Wagaman Strategies, reported the first couple of hearings are intended to not talk about what makes for the good representation on a broad level. In addition to the two public hearings to receive input on composition for the maps, there will be two public hearings after maps are drafted. He explained the tight timeline is determined by State law. Mr. Wagaman presented the City's demographics based upon the 2020 United States census, including breakdowns by race and those of voting age. He reported the six criteria governing the districting process in order of priority, noting there can be a give-and-take if one conflicts with another. Mr. Wagaman reported the first criterion is having "substantially" equal populations between the districts with the difference between the largest and smallest districts being within 10%. The second criterion is adhering to federal law focused mainly on race and ethnicity. He reported race must not be the predominant factor but it can be considered. He reported Pleasanton has a substantial Asian and Pacific Islander (API) population but noted it is very evenly distributed throughout the City and there are very few areas with an API majority. He advised it is unlikely the federal Voting Rights Act will apply to Pleasanton but it will continue to be monitored. The third criterion is contiguity which states all parts of a district should be connected. He reported the fourth criterion is neighborhoods and communities. He noted this is where the public plays a very important role so they do not draw boundaries dividing communities of interest. He advised a community of interest is defined as an area with a common social or economic interest that should be together in a single district for fair and effective representation. communities can overlap or people may have different definitions of where the community extends. City Council Minutes Page 2 of 10 January 4, 2022