My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2021-18
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC-2021-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 11:28:46 AM
Creation date
4/25/2022 11:28:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2021-18
NOTES
PUD-138, MARTIN INDERBITZEN, AVS RANCH LLC, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NOTES 2
VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, 25-LOT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, APN NO. 949-16-6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2021-18 <br /> Page Seven <br /> 2. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future <br /> passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. <br /> This subdivision would create 22 residential lots and 3 open space parcels. The <br /> future homes would generally be oriented in an east-west orientation for southern <br /> exposure and provide for passive heating and/or cooling opportunities. The future <br /> homes would be required to comply with the City's residential Green Building <br /> Ordinance (provided that they are 2,000 sq. ft. or more in size), which requires <br /> that each home achieve a "Green Home" rating on Alameda County Waste <br /> Management Authority's "Single-Family Green Building Rating System." Energy <br /> efficiency is the cornerstone of every green home. Solar water heating systems, <br /> photovoltaic energy systems, and energy efficient windows are some of the <br /> possible green features that the future homeowners may choose to achieve the <br /> "Green Home" rating. As such, the Commission recommend that the City Council <br /> conclude that this finding can be made. The project is required to include PV <br /> panels and batteries in each of the homes constructed. <br /> 3. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map, together with its design <br /> and improvement, is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. <br /> The proposed subdivision and improvements are consistent with the objectives, <br /> policies, land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan and HVSP. The <br /> Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the subdivision <br /> is compatible with the objectives, policies, land uses, and programs specified in <br /> both the General Plan and HVSP. <br /> 4. The subdivision site is physically suitable for this type and density of <br /> development. <br /> The subdivision would create 22 residential lots, each over an acre in size, with <br /> lot configurations and development standards compatible with the existing lots in <br /> the neighborhood. The design guidelines require future home designs to be <br /> suitable for the existing neighborhood settings. With the landslide repairs in the <br /> area designed for agriculture and open space (Parcel C), the site will be suitable <br /> for the proposed development. Thus, the Planning Commission recommends that <br /> the City Council find that the subdivision site is physically suitable for the type <br /> and density of development. <br /><br /> regulations/development plan. <br /> The design and improvements of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 <br /> closely follow and conform to the proposed PUD development plan. The Planning <br /> Commission recommends that the City Council find that the subdivision map <br /> conforms to the zoning regulations and the proposed development plan. <br />onfigurated to provide adequate circulation for fire, police, and other <br /> emergency vehicles. The new homes will be equipped with automatic residential <br /> fire sprinklers. In addition, the Project is conditioned to provide an Open-Space <br />In addition, the flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency <br /> Management Agency (FEMA) indicate that the subject property is not located in a <br /> flood hazard zone. As such, the Commission recommends that the City Council <br /> conclude that this finding can be made. <br />censed civil engineer, <br /> which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 25 <br />d) individuals. <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 25 <br />