Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2021-18 <br /> Page Six <br /> Management and Wildland Fire Management Plans subject for review and <br /> approval by the Fire Marshal. Furthermore, the future homes will be required to <br /> meet the requirements of applicable City and State codes. As such, the <br /> Commission recommends that the City Council conclude that this finding can be <br /> made. <br /> 7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: <br /> The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the <br /> proposed Project conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. The primary <br /> purpose of the PUD district is to allow flexibility in the development of projects the <br /> City determines are in its best interest. The Commission finds the slightly <br /> narrower lot width on Lots 2-7 is acceptable. This 5% difference from standard <br /> (175 feet required vs 165 feet proposed) would not substantially diminish the <br /> semi-rural feel or spacious layout of these one-plus acre lots. Additionally, the <br /> overall lot pattern is consistent and logical with wider lots located when a street <br /> curves and at street corners. Thus, the proposed site layout and development <br /> standards meets the PUD requirements and the HVSP. Additionally, the Planning <br /> Commission finds that proposed setbacks would provide adequate distance <br /> between buildings thus would allow ample natural light to each lot and future <br /> residence. Thus, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council <br /> find that the proposed project, as conditioned, would help to implement the <br /> purposes of the PUD ordinance by allowing for flexible site standards that meets <br /> the City's General Plan and HVSP and results in a development plan that <br /> optimizes the use of this site in a reasonably sensitive manner. As such, the <br /> Commission recommends that the City Council conclude that this finding can be <br /> made. <br /> Section 3: With respect to the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map application, State law <br /> and the Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) set forth the <br /> considerations to be addressed in reviewing a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. The <br /> Planning Commission makes the following findings and determinations with respect to <br /> each of the considerations for approval of a subdivision as required by Sections <br /> 19.20.110 and 19.22.060 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC): <br /> 1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map conforms to the zoning <br /> regulations/development plan. <br /> The design and improvements of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 <br /> closely follow and conform to the proposed PUD development plan. The Planning <br /> Commission recommends that the City Council find that the subdivision map <br /> conforms to the zoning regulations and the proposed development plan. <br />onfigurated to provide adequate circulation for fire, police, and other <br /> emergency vehicles. The new homes will be equipped with automatic residential <br /> fire sprinklers. In addition, the Project is conditioned to provide an Open-Space <br />In addition, the flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency <br /> Management Agency (FEMA) indicate that the subject property is not located in a <br /> flood hazard zone. As such, the Commission recommends that the City Council <br /> conclude that this finding can be made. <br />censed civil engineer, <br /> which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 25 <br />d) individuals. <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 25 <br />