My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2021-18
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC-2021-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 11:28:46 AM
Creation date
4/25/2022 11:28:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2021-18
NOTES
PUD-138, MARTIN INDERBITZEN, AVS RANCH LLC, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NOTES 2
VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, 25-LOT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, APN NO. 949-16-6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2021-18 <br /> Page Three <br /> 2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any <br /> applicable specific plan: <br /> The Project site has a General Plan Land Use designations of"Low Density <br /> Residential/Open Space" on the General Plan Map. The General Plan Land Use <br /> Element indicates that General Plan Land Uses, densities and street alignments <br /> that are within specific plan areas are only conceptually shown on the General <br /> Plan Map while the Specific Plan provides additional detail. The Project site is <br /> located in the Happy Valley Specific Plan (HVSP) area. Therefore, the proposed <br /> development will need to conform to the Land Use Designation and density <br /> indicated by the HVSP. <br /> The General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Low Density <br /> Residential, allowing one unit per 1.5 gross acres in the Happy Valley area when <br /> the project is developed in conjunction with major dedication of open-space land <br /> or agriculture/open space easements to the City. The project site is <br /> approximately 112 acres in area. The proposed development consists of 22 <br /> residential single-family unit in an approximately 33-acre portion of the site, with <br /> a resultant density of 1 unit per 1.5 acres, with the remaining approximately 80 <br /> acres be preserved as agriculture/open space through an easement dedication to <br /> the City. The proposal meets the General Plan Density requirement. <br /> The HVSP has land use designations of PUD-SRDR and PUD-A/OS for the <br /> project site. The HVSP density section for the subject site states a maximum of <br /> 22 units may be permitted at the 33-acre PUD-SRDR portion of Lot 98 in return <br /> for major dedication of open space land or agriculture/open space easements to <br /> the City at the time of final subdivision map approval. <br /> As proposed, the Project meets this density requirement. <br /> 3. Whether the plan is compatible with previously developed properties in the <br /> vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the site: <br /> The existing surrounding neighborhoods include a mixture of one-and-two-story <br /> residences with a variety of architectural styles. The Commission recommends <br /> that the City Council find that the design criteria listed in the Design Guidelines <br /> would result in future homes constructed in a style and manner compatible with <br /> the land use pattern in the neighborhood and previously developed properties in <br /> the vicinity. The proposed pad elevations are compatible with the existing lots in <br /> the vicinity and the development standards and design guidelines would ensure <br /> the future homes are sited to minimize impacts on surrounding neighbors to the <br /> extent feasible. The Project has been designed around wetlands on the project <br /> site and the existing historic windmill will be retained as a special feature. The <br /> heights on several lots have been limited to a single story so as to preserve <br /> views towards the hillsides from both public streets and the interior of the site. <br /> As such, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find the <br /> development is sensitive to the existing environmental setting. In addition, <br /> the vicinity. <br />Page 18 of 25 <br /><br /> Plan as part of the improvement plans prepared by a California licensed civil engineer, <br /> which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 25 <br />d) individuals. <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 25 <br />