|
EXHIBIT A
<br /> DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
<br /> P19-0410, Design Review
<br /> 715 Rose Avenue
<br /> April 27, 2022
<br /> The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this approval, that (s)he is required to satisfy and maintain
<br /> compliance with the conditions of approval below. Where approval by the Director of Community
<br /> Development, Planning Division, Director of Engineering/City Engineer, City Attorney, Chief Building and
<br /> Safety Official, Fire Department or other City staff is required, review shall be for compliance with all
<br /> applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and
<br /> accepted practices related to the approval. In addition to complying with the conditions below, the
<br /> applicant is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws that pertain to this project
<br /> whether or not specifically noted herein.
<br /> This approval is granted for Design Review approval to: 1) construct an approximately 1,344-square-foot
<br /> detached two-story, two-unit home in front of the existing single-story home; and 2) demolish the
<br /> detached garage and construct an approximately 1,385-square-foot detached two-story garage with unit
<br /> above, behind the existing single-story home, and related site improvements at Assessor Parcel No. 094-
<br /> 0127-034-01) at 715 Rose Avenue. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project materials
<br /> listed below:
<br /> a. Project plans, Exhibit B, prepared by Hereld & Ayres Architects, for John Francisco, dated
<br /> "Received" on January 26, 2022, and kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community
<br /> Development Department
<br /> b. Environmental Noise and Vibration Study, prepared by Salter, dated "12 March, 2021," and kept
<br /> on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
<br /> c. Geotechnical Investigation report prepared by GFK & Associates Inc., dated "September 27,
<br /> 2021," and kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
<br /> d. Arborist report and tree protection plan prepared by Traverso Tree Service, dated "October 26,
<br /> 2020," and kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
<br /> The project materials listed above are collectively the "Approved Plans."
<br /> THIS APPROVAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
<br /> 1. APPROVAL AND REVISIONS: The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance
<br /> with the "Approved Plans", except as modified by the following conditions. Minor changes to the
<br /> plans may be allowed subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development if found
<br /> to be in substantial conformance with the approved exhibits. Planning Division approval is
<br /> required before any changes are implemented in site design, grading, architectural design, house
<br /> colors or materials, green building measures, landscape material, etc.
<br /> 2. EXPIRATION — DESIGN REVIEW: This design review approval shall lapse 1 year from the
<br /> effective date of approval unless a building permit is issued and construction has commenced
<br /> and is diligently pursued towards completion, or the City has approved a time extension.
<br />y residential streetscape;
<br /> P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission
<br /> 8of11
<br />y, especially for residential. She requested more data
<br /> on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus
<br /> the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was
<br /> worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short
<br /> term.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022
<br />a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO.
<br /> Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the
<br /> low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two
<br /> fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit).
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022
<br />
|