My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
4_Exhibits A & C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
04-27
>
4_Exhibits A & C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/20/2022 1:47:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
4
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2022\04-27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2022-07 <br /> Page Three <br /> Section 2: The Planning Commission hereby approves P19-0410 as reflected in the <br /> plans dated January 26, 2022, to: 1) construct an approximately 1,344-square-foot <br /> detached two-story, two-unit home in front of the existing single-story home; and 2) <br /> demolish the approximately 880-square-foot detached garage and construct an <br /> approximately 725-square-foot detached garage with an approximately 660-square-foot <br /> unit above, behind the existing single-story home and related improvements at 715 <br /> Rose Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 1, attached hereto <br /> and incorporated into this resolution by reference. <br /> Section 3: This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and <br /> adoption. <br /> PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on April 27, 2022, by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: <br /> Noes: <br /> Absent: <br /> Abstain: <br /> ATTEST: <br /> Melinda Denis Brandon Pace <br /> Secretary, Planning Commission Chair <br /> APPROVED AS TO FORM/fra,/,- <br /> ;#2 <br /> Julie Harryman ..... <br /> Assistant City Attorney %%i • <br />e the project <br /> and streetscape. <br /> The proposed infill development conforms to the General and Downtown Specific <br /> Plans including the density, height, and proposed use. The neighboring properties <br /> include single- and multi-family homes and the Alameda County Fairgrounds. Adding <br /> infill residential units to a site with an existing single-family home complements the <br /> neighborhood. The Commission also considered the parking on-site and determined <br /> the proposed parking meets the standards of the respective zoning districts. <br /> The adjacent buildings to the subject lot are one- and two-story buildings. The <br /> proposed two- story residential buildings will be mostly screened from view with <br /> visibility along Rose Avenue. While visible from neighboring properties, the proposed <br /> buildings have massing that is consistent with neighboring structures and are <br /> designed to minimize their scale through their building design (i.e., articulation such <br /> as building insets, color and material, and architectural detailing). The proposed <br /> design includes architectural detailing consistent with the existing building on-site <br /> (e.g., uses matching materials and architectural style). As such, the Planning <br /> Commission finds the project has an appropriate relationship to its site, the <br /> streetscape, and public view. <br /> As noted, the new buildings incorporate similar design elements to the existing <br /> building on-site. The project design also considers function in the design (e.g., <br /> accounts for trash cans and mechanical equipment). As such, the Planning <br /> Commission finds the proposal to be positive and appropriate for site, landscaping, <br /> and building design and finishes expected for new development within the Downtown <br /> and the city. <br /> The Planning Commission concludes the required Design Criteria can be made to <br /> approve the subject application, as conditioned. <br />he single-family residential streetscape; <br /> P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 8of11 <br />y, especially for residential. She requested more data <br /> on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus <br /> the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was <br /> worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short <br /> term. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO. <br /> Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the <br /> low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two <br /> fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit). <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />