My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 12072021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 12072021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2022 8:50:45 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 8:32:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Henrissa Bassey, of Centro Legal de la Raza, stated her intention of ensuring this ordinance would not <br /> result in the displacement of community members through lease violations. She noted if the ordinance's <br /> language is incorporated into leases it could lead to evictions, causing stress which would increase the <br /> likelihood of smoking. She advised a $100 fine is steep for many low-income residents and would <br /> increase the stress of being able to meet their monthly rent to remain housed. She expressed concerns <br /> over the disproportionate impact to black and brown residents if a private party can bring a civil lawsuit, <br /> noting their research showing minority residents face a higher likelihood of being sued than white <br /> neighbors acting similarly. She encouraged more investment in smoking cessation programs or tobacco <br /> hotlines. She advised these programs could be an alternative option to a fine for offenders. <br /> Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified the PMC does not provide for <br /> smoking cessation programs so the City Council would have to work with a group to figure it out <br /> together. She advised if the goal is to not have fines, staff could remove this portion from the ordinance, <br /> but stated it would be difficult to say the ordinance would have a certain cessation program where one <br /> does not currently exist. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Assistant City Attorney Seto stated the civil action clause is in the <br /> ordinance because there have been situations with rental housing and elsewhere with individual <br /> property owners calling the PPD multiple times weekly asking for an immediate response. She noted <br /> this will not always be the PPD's highest priority so these are the people who likely would set up <br /> personal security cameras and bring private civil suits. She advised the City has the discretion to <br /> decide what level of enforcement to undertake. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Assistant City Attorney Seto confirmed the City Council could <br /> make a policy decision for the ordinance's language to not be included in leases and used as the basis <br /> for an eviction. She advised with private property owners the City typically would not request signage <br /> unlike with multi-family rental housing. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Assistant City Attorney Seto agreed it feel awkward having <br /> neighbors recording video of their neighbors smoking but acknowledged this is the most common <br /> source of complaints received. She clarified if the smoker is visible from a public place it is not spying. <br /> Interim City Manager Dolan clarified it may be uncomfortable to have residents videotaping their <br /> neighbors but the purpose of the ordinance is being violated in these instances. He noted the ordinance <br /> is hard for the City alone to enforce. <br /> Mayor Brown stated the first step should be to knock on your neighbor's door and initiate a <br /> conversation instead of videotaping them or calling the PPD. Councilmember Balch agreed. <br /> Councilmember Testa noted Mr. Cummings offered on behalf of Alameda County to help manage the <br /> complaint process while treating it as an educational opportunity. She stated she would like to hear <br /> more about this method of accomplishing the City's goals with a softer hand. She stated the City <br /> Council has repeatedly heard calls of concern over second-hand smoke from townhouses, particularly <br /> during the pandemic, calling for a full smoking ban. She expressed appreciation for public comments <br /> about walls not stopping smoke. She stated it is a real concern hurting a lot of community members. <br /> Councilmember Testa moved to approve staff's recommendation with the additional language to <br /> include inside units, and also adding the requirement of a designated smoking area. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Assistant City Attorney Seto confirmed in the rental-unit <br /> ordinance the managers have the option to designate a smoking area because many complexes are <br /> entirely non-smoking. She noted the ordinance does specify a designated smoking area has to be 25 <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 18 December 7, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.