My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 12072021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 12072021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2022 8:50:45 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 8:32:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Testa stated if they prohibited smoking inside the units they could have a designated <br /> smoking area similar to the City's multi-family rental ordinance allowing smoking on site. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto reported they received no emails <br /> back from the 45 contacted HOAs and management companies. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto confirmed PPD staff were involved <br /> in the process but not Chief David Swing specifically. She stated PPD officers strongly advocated <br /> restricting the proposed areas. She reported the PPD expressed concerns over the ability to enforce <br /> indoors creating unrealistic enforcement expectations from neighbors leading to conflict. She clarified <br /> with rental units the property managers can enter the apartments to enforce a smoking prohibition but <br /> HOAs do not have this ability over a smoking concern. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified they can define a motor <br /> vehicle parked in a common area with its windows closed as not being an enclosed area. She advised <br /> this could ensure people do not smoke in their cars, noting second-hand smoke exposure can happen <br /> as soon as the car door is opened. She confirmed this language would have to be in a motion to ensure <br /> clarity on smoking in parked cars. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified neighbors could take a picture of a <br /> neighbor to turn them in. She noted sometimes people are chain smokers and outside long enough for <br /> an officer to be dispatched, arrive, and catch them in the act. Sometimes a resident may call their <br /> management company. She advised it can be hard to attach a discarded cigarette to a specific person <br /> because they are not going to perform a DNA test on them. She confirmed the ordinance is on a <br /> complaint basis and they are not staking out parking lots looking for people smoking in their cars. <br /> Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. <br /> David Stark, representing the Bay East Association of Realtors, and speaking as a homeowner, stated <br /> the ordinance raises some practical questions about the implementation mechanics. He stated <br /> landlords are required to update their leases to reflect the City ordinance and also enforce the City's <br /> ordinance. He asked why there was not more outreach in the form of town halls or workshops to <br /> specific townhome and condominium owners as opposed to just HOAs. He asked if the 2017 apartment <br /> ordinance aimed at large rental agencies applies to individual homeowners; if a tenant refusing to have <br /> this added to their lease could be evicted due to the County eviction moratorium; what the penalties for <br /> landlords would be; if this would open the door for the City to lean on property owners to implement <br /> other City policies; and if there are ways to achieve the City's non-smoking goals without inserting itself <br /> into contracts between private parties. He encouraged the City Council to reach out to more <br /> stakeholders to develop a fairer, responsible, and enforceable ordinance. <br /> Jon Krueger thanked the City Council for acting to protect the health of residents from dangerous <br /> second-hand smoke. He advised removing the exemption for smoking inside the homes could make it <br /> even stronger. He advised the smoke does not stop at the boundaries of the house. He noted the City <br /> of Danville and others are already doing this and enforcement has not been a problem. <br /> Paul Cummings, Tobacco Control Program Director for the Alameda County Public Health Department, <br /> commended the 2017 apartment ordinance and thanked the City Council for looking into this issue <br /> again. He stated several communities are banning smoking in all units. He stated a focus on education <br /> and compliance, not enforcement, has worked well elsewhere locally. He reported residential second- <br /> hand smoke complaints have increased during the pandemic with more people at home for extended <br /> periods. He called for a prohibition on smoking within units to protect the most people possible. He <br /> stated the County would be willing to support Pleasanton in helping with complaint calls and education. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 18 December 7,2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.