My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
031522
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 12:24:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2022 12:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition to these priorities, the Affordable Housing Fees (i.e., the LIHF) Chapter <br />17.40 of the PMC also notes, in Section 17.40.040.C.: "When the city uses affordable <br />housing fund moneys to construct or assist in the construction of lower-income units, <br />the city may establish the rules which will apply to occupancy of said units. It is the <br />intention of this chapter to and the general plan that such units be made available on a <br />priority basis to Pleasanton residents and workers."' <br />In reviewing the policies and priorities, staff believes they provide reasonable guidance <br />that aligns well both with the most important housing needs in the community, <br />particularly the groups for which state law dictates a particular or special effort must be <br />made to serve. <br />In recognition that housing projects are often opportunistic, it is likely in the City's <br />interest to retain flexibility and discretion in how to allocate the LIHF, rather than set up <br />a more rigid framework of policy preferences for allocation of City housing funds. <br />However, the City Council may wish to weigh in on whether other priorities should be <br />established, or an alternative approach taken to that which is in place today. As noted in <br />the recommendations section, some members of the Housing Commission suggested <br />they could benefit from more strategic direction when formulating recommendations on <br />how funds are allocated, and to understand the relative costs and benefits of various <br />uses of LIHF. <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance <br />Pleasanton's IZO was adopted in 2000, to require development to provide affordable <br />units constructed as part of a housing project. Prior to this, only the LIHF was levied to <br />facilitate the City's affordable housing goals. The City's IZO requires: <br />• New multifami!y residential projects of 15 units or more to provide at least 15 <br />percent of the dwellings as affordable to very low- and/or low-income households <br />• New single-family residential projects of 15 units or more to provide at least 20 <br />percent of the project's units as affordable to very low-, low-, and/or moderate - <br />income households. <br />• Commercial, office and industrial development to either pay the LIHF or provide <br />affordable housing as part of the project. <br />The specific mix of the units within the three affordability categories is subject to <br />approval by the City Council; inclusionary units are required to remain affordable in <br />perpetuity through recordation of an affordable housing agreement for the project. <br />3 It should be noted that, while the Ordinance's policy intention is clear, many affordable housing projects <br />have used a combination of local- and non -local sources of funding; the majority of these funding sources <br />come with limitations on the types of preferences that may be set and may preclude an explicit local <br />preference being established or used as the primary basis for determining eligibility for a housing unit. <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.