Laserfiche WebLink
a. Referring to the Geotechnical Feasibility Report, Figures 2 and 8 show <br /> cross-section A-A through a landslide with recommended corrective <br /> grading. This area does not appear to be enclosed within the dashed line <br /> on the Vesting Tentative Map with note reading, "Approximate limits of <br /> landslide repair-remove & replace slide deposit, restore to original grade". <br /> This landslide shall be repaired as recommended in the report. <br /> b. Section B on Sheet TM 6.0 of the Vesting Tentative Map shall be <br /> modified for the grading conform at neighboring properties to the north. <br /> In lieu of grading down from the pad to the existing ground surface at the <br /> subdivision boundary, instead the section must show retaining walls such <br /> that no storm runoff will flow across the subdivision boundary. (PROJECT <br /> SPECIFIC CONDITION) <br /> 47. MUNICIPAL REGIONAL PERMIT (C.3): Referring to the Vesting Tentative Map <br /> together with the Bay Area Hydraulic Model (BAHM) report, the following design <br /> parameters shall be checked by the applicant (Address this condition prior to <br /> improvement plan approval): <br /> a. The note at the bottom of the table on Sheet TM 5.0 states, "The <br /> calculations are based on the Alameda Countywide Clean Water <br /> Program C.3 Technical Guidance...", yet a report was submitted using <br /> BAHM. The note should therefore read, "The calculations are based on <br /> the Bay Area Hydraulic Model (BAHM). When comparing the numbers in <br /> the table to the BAHM calculation, the following discrepancies were <br /> noted: <br /> i. The input parameters in the BAHM calculations for DMA 2 (page 5) <br /> indicate an impervious total of 6.238 acres whereas the summation of <br /> areas from the table suggest a total of 6.45 acres (81,700 SF + <br /> 104,400 SF + 95,000 SF = 281,100 SF = 6.45 acres). <br /> ii. Based on the impervious area total, the BAHM calculations (page 12) <br /> indicate a needed area for DMA 2 of 25,000 SF (200' X 125' = 25,000 <br /> SF). In contrast, the table shows a provided area of 24,850 SF. <br /> b. Because the storm drain design proposes the use of two parallel pipe <br /> networks, one for storm runoff requiring treatment. and one for storm <br /> runoff from open space areas that does not require treatment that <br /> converge at BMP 2, BMP 2 will function both as a treatment feature and <br /> detention basin during large storm events. The BAHM calculations (page <br /> 12) indicate that water will rise to a depth of 2.5' or 30" before discharging <br /> into the overflow outlet. The landscaping within the basin must therefore <br /> be designed to survive when inundated. <br /> In addition, water in the basin that rises above 18" is considered a <br /> drowning risk for children. The California Building Code requires said <br /> basins to be enclosed with a self-closing, self-latching fence with release <br /> PUD-138 and VTM 8616 Planning Commission <br /> Page 13 of 30 <br />