Laserfiche WebLink
4. P21-1043, Big Minds Unschool, 6691 Owens Drive — Application for Conditional Use <br /> Permit approval to operate a private school at 6691 Owens Drive. Zoning is PUD-I/C-O <br /> (Planned Unit Development — Industrial/Commercial — Office) District. <br /> Commissioner Allen moved to approve the Consent Calendar Items. <br /> Commissioner Nibert seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, Gaidos, Nibert, and Pace <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> The Actions of the Zoning Administrator were approved, as submitted. <br /> The Meeting Minutes of December 8, 2021, were approved, as submitted. <br /> P21-1102, Galactic Challenge, Inc., 2241 Stoneridge Mall Rd Unit C215A is approved as <br /> submitted. <br /> P21-1043, Big Minds Unschool, 6691 Owens Drive is approved as submitted. <br /> MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> 5. Public Comment from the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda — <br /> Speakers are encouraged to limit comments to 3 minutes. <br /> There were no speaker cards submitted. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 6. P21-0715, Lighthouse Baptist School, 118 Neal Street— Application for Conditional Use <br /> Permit approval to operate a private school at 118 Neal Street. Zoning is RM-4 (Multi-Family <br /> Residential) District <br /> This item was continued to a future Planning Commission Meeting date. <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 7. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> Commissioner Nibert provided a report on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee <br /> meeting held on January 24, 2022. <br /> 8. Actions of the City Council <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 January 26, 2022 <br />s C-R (m) (Regional Commercial District (Mall)) District. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 3 January 26, 2022 <br />on on lifts and in-lieu fees. <br /> He discussed the need to manage density and policy questions on how to address the issues. <br /> Ms. Harryman stated the Council might not want to address the policy questions unless it knew <br /> the Commission liked the project. Chair Pace suggested the possibility of conditioning the <br /> approval in a way the Council would consider the lift. Ms. Clark stated the lift was not an <br /> acceptable solution to meet the parking requirement and the Commission should decide <br /> whether it supported the in-lieu fee. Ms. Harryman discussed the proposed lift and questioned <br /> whether the project was better without the lift or with the lift that would get used when needed. <br /> Commissioner Brown stated the tenant might use the lift if they had two cars or to store a car <br /> used infrequently. He discussed options for the Commission's recommendations on the <br /> project. <br /> Chair Pace asked if any Commissioners had concerns about the design. The Commissioners <br /> indicated support for the design and clarified that the only concerns were related to parking. <br /> Commissioner Allen moved to deny the project as proposed. <br /> Ms. Clark stated the applicant could appeal the decision to the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Brown moved to approve the project removing the lift and lift screening <br /> but approve the in-lieu parking fee. The motion died due to lack of a second. <br /> Commissioner Gaidos seconded Commissioner Allen's motion to deny the project. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 January 12, 2022 <br />asked why the project was <br /> proposing the lift. Ms. Clark explained that the lift spot was better than no space. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 January 12, 2022 <br />