Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF <br /> ,,,_s PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> 4LEASANTON MEETING MINUTES <br /> DRAFT <br /> Wednesday, January 26, 2022 <br /> This meeting was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Governor Newsom's Executive <br /> Order N-29-20, approved AB 361, and COVID-19 pandemic protocols. <br /> CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND ROLL CALL <br /> The teleconference meeting of the Planning Commission of January 26, 2022 was called to order <br /> at 7:01 p.m. by Chair Pace. <br /> The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Gaidos. <br /> Staff Members Present: Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development; Julie Harryman, <br /> Assistant City Attorney; Eric Luchini, Senior Planner; Diego Mora, <br /> Assistant Planner; Sachiko Riddle, Recording Secretary <br /> Commissioners Present: Commissioners Nancy Allen, Justin Brown, Matt Gaidos, Jeff Nibert, <br /> and Chair Brandon Pace. Commissioner Ken Morgan joined the <br /> meeting late. <br /> Commissioners Absent: None <br /> AGENDA AMENDMENTS <br /> Item 6 was continued to a future Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR - Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted by one <br /> motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Planning <br /> Commission or a member of the public by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br /> 1. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br /> 2. Approve the meeting minutes of December 8, 2021 <br /> 3. P21-1102, Galactic Challenge, Inc., 2241 Stoneridge Mall Road Unit C215A—Application <br /> for Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a game arcade at 2441 Stoneridge Mall Road, <br /> C215A. Zoning is C-R (m) (Regional Commercial District (Mall)) District. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 3 January 26, 2022 <br />on on lifts and in-lieu fees. <br /> He discussed the need to manage density and policy questions on how to address the issues. <br /> Ms. Harryman stated the Council might not want to address the policy questions unless it knew <br /> the Commission liked the project. Chair Pace suggested the possibility of conditioning the <br /> approval in a way the Council would consider the lift. Ms. Clark stated the lift was not an <br /> acceptable solution to meet the parking requirement and the Commission should decide <br /> whether it supported the in-lieu fee. Ms. Harryman discussed the proposed lift and questioned <br /> whether the project was better without the lift or with the lift that would get used when needed. <br /> Commissioner Brown stated the tenant might use the lift if they had two cars or to store a car <br /> used infrequently. He discussed options for the Commission's recommendations on the <br /> project. <br /> Chair Pace asked if any Commissioners had concerns about the design. The Commissioners <br /> indicated support for the design and clarified that the only concerns were related to parking. <br /> Commissioner Allen moved to deny the project as proposed. <br /> Ms. Clark stated the applicant could appeal the decision to the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Brown moved to approve the project removing the lift and lift screening <br /> but approve the in-lieu parking fee. The motion died due to lack of a second. <br /> Commissioner Gaidos seconded Commissioner Allen's motion to deny the project. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 January 12, 2022 <br />asked why the project was <br /> proposing the lift. Ms. Clark explained that the lift spot was better than no space. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 January 12, 2022 <br />