_Minutes_January 12, 2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ponderosa development, explaining that the homes were approved for two-story homes but the applicant reapplied for single-story homes on Cameron Circle. Commissioner Brown asked if the Cameron Circle homes could add a second story. Ms. Amos explained that the PUD stipulated only single-story homes but a PUD modification could be requested. Commissioner Nibert referenced letters of opposition stating the neighbors and City blocked development of two-story homes. Ms. Amos stated that was incorrect information and the City had not blocked development of two-story homes. She explained that the applicant had decided to void their original approval for two-story homes and apply for single-story homes due to economic and marketing reasons. Commissioner Nibert referenced another email regarding setback requirements. Ms. Amos stated the Cameron Circle lots were smaller than the surrounding area and the larger lots of the proposed project warranted greater setbacks. Commissioner Nibert confirmed that the proposed homes exceeded the setbacks on Cameron Circle. Commissioner Brown asked the distance from the proposed houses to the existing house on the corner. Ms. Amos stated the closest point on one side was 80 feet and the other side was a bit closer but she did not have the exact measurement. In response to Commissioner Brown, Ms. Amos indicated the corner property was not built by Ponderosa. Commissioner Allen asked if there were line of site visuals from the house on the corner to show the impact to the existing property. Ms. Amos stated there were no visuals but the existing property had several trees and the applicant proposed planting more trees. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ramprasad Srirama, Applicant, and Terry Townsend, Architect, provided a presentation on the item. Krishna Yalamanchi provided comments on Item 6 and shared his support for the project. Akash Jayanthilal provided comments on Item 6 and shared his support for the project. Anurag Jain provided comments on Item 6 and shared his support for the project. Sue McKinley provided comments on Item 6 and shared her support for the project. The Applicant, Mr. Srirama, thanked the speakers for support of the project and discussed efforts to retain the privacy of the neighbors. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED In response to Commissioner Nibert, Ms. Amos discussed the setbacks. Chair Pace asked to see a view of the proposed landscaping between the proposed and existing lot. Ms. Amos displayed the landscape plan and proposed landscaping between the Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 January 12, 2022 e meeting, such as reducing the amount of testimony time allotted to the applicant and all those who wish to speak when the meeting agenda is lengthy or when there are numerous speakers for any specific item.The audience is requested to respect and extend courtesy to all those wishing to testify on all cases by being quiet while others are speaking. **************************************