Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />SECTION 3 Planning Commission makes the following findings and determinations with <br />respect to each of the considerations for approval of a subdivision as required by Sections <br />19.20.110 and 19.22.060 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC): <br /> <br />1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map conforms to the zoning <br />regulations/development plan. <br /> <br />The design and improvements of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 closely follow <br />and conform to the proposed PUD development plan. The City Council finds that the <br />subdivision map conforms to the zoning regulations and the proposed development plan. <br /> <br />2. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or <br />natural heating or cooling opportunities. <br /> <br />This subdivision would create 22 residential lots and 3 open space parcels. The future <br />homes would generally be oriented in an east-west orientation for southern exposure and <br />provide for passive heating and/or cooling opportunities. The future homes would be <br />required to comply with the City’s residential Green Building Ordinance (provided that they <br />are 2,000 sq. ft. or more in size), which requires that each home achieve a “Green Home” <br />rating on Alameda County Waste Management Authority’s “Single-Family Green Building <br />Rating System.” Energy efficiency is the cornerstone of every green home. Solar water <br />heating systems, photovoltaic energy systems, and energy efficient windows are some of <br />the possible green features that the future homeowners may choose to achieve the “Green <br />Home” rating. As such, the City Council concludes that this finding can be made. The <br />project is required to include PV panels and batteries in each of the homes constructed. <br /> <br />3. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map, together with its design <br /> and improvement, is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision and improvements are consistent with the objectives, policies, <br />land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan and HVSP. The City Council finds <br />that the subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, land uses, and programs <br />specified in both the General Plan and HVSP. <br /> <br />4. The subdivision site is physically suitable for this type and density of development. <br /> <br />The subdivision would create 22 residential lots, each over an acre in size, with lot <br />configurations and development standards compatible with the existing lots in the <br />neighborhood. The design guidelines require future home designs to be suitable for the <br />existing neighborhood settings. With the landslide repairs in the area designed for <br />agriculture and open space (Parcel C), the site will be suitable for the proposed <br />development. Thus, the City Council finds that the subdivision site is physically suitable <br />for the type and density of development. <br />