14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Parks and Recreation Commission Action On June 10, 2021, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the trails network proposed in conjunction the development proposal and expressed support for it. Some of the Commissioners wished to see a park included in the development proposal. After taking public testimony, the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended approval of the trail component of the project to the City Council. Housing Commission Action On June 17, 2021, the Affordable Housing Agreement associated with the development proposal was presented to the Housing Commission. In addition to payment of Lower- Income Housing Fees (LIHF), the proposal would include the building of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on each of the 22 buildable lots, and each ADU would be constructed together with the primary residence. The proposed ADUs would not substitute for any portion of the otherwise-required LIHF. The Housing Commission, after discussion of fees and terms of the agreement, unanimously recommended approval of the Affordable Housing Agreement to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Find the Initial Study and consistency analysis for the project have determined it is consistent with the HVSP, the HVSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), and eligible for the CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15183 procedures for project review and approval; 2. Find the proposed development is consistent with the 2005-2025 City of Pleasanton General Plan; 3. Find the proposed development is consistent with the HVSP; 4. Adopt an ordinance approving the PUD development plan and vesting subdivision map subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment 1); 5. Adopt a resolution approving the Affordable Housing Agreement for the project (Attachment 2); 6. Adopt a resolution authorizing vacation of a segment of public roadway (Attachment 3). FISCAL IMPACT The applicant would be responsible for the payment of development impact fees and for the costs of any required utility or infrastructure improvements. The applicant has also agreed to fund a portion of the costs to construct the Alisal Trail, with costs also addressed by application of Capital Facilities and Transportation Development Fees. Although the project would incrementally increase the demand for City services, it would also add sales and property tax revenue, if approved, and, through the payment of Impact Fees, appropriately offset the costs of future capital facilities and infrastructure as determined through the City's approved Nexus Studies and adopted fee schedule. Page 2 of 18