My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:37:37 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:04:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> Prior to 2017 the City had the following debt policies for several years that have guided <br /> the City's debt issuances: <br /> • The City will limit the use of debt so as not to place a burden on the fiscal <br /> resources of the City and its taxpayers. <br /> • The City will limit long-term borrowing to capital improvements or projects that <br /> cannot be financed from current revenues. <br /> • When capital projects are financed, the City will amortize the debt within a <br /> period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project. <br /> • The City will attempt to limit the General Fund annual debt service payments to <br /> 10% of the total General Fund revenue. <br /> • Whenever possible, the City will investigate the use of special assessment, <br /> revenue or other self-supporting bonds to limit the General Fund obligation for <br /> debt service payments. <br /> • The City will not use long-term debt for current operations. <br /> • The City will not use short-term borrowing to support routine operations, <br /> provided however, that it may be used to meet temporary cash flow needs. <br /> • The City will utilize inter-fund loans when possible to reduce the cost of <br /> financing capital improvements. <br /> However, the City did not have policies or guidelines related to debt management <br /> including selection of the financing team, the types of debt it will issue, performance <br /> standards, market relationships, or on-going debt administration. All of these areas have <br /> become standard for public sector entities to include in a debt policy. In addition, SB <br /> 1029 adopted in September of 2016 requires local agencies that issue debt to adopt a <br /> comprehensive debt policy that promotes the professional management of debt. <br /> Specifically, SB 1029 requires an adopted debt policy that includes: <br /> a. The purposes for which debt proceeds may be used. <br /> b. The types of debt that may be issued. <br /> c. The relationship of the debt to, and integration with, the issuer's capital <br /> improvement program. <br /> d. Policy goals related to the issuer's planning goals and objectives. <br /> e. The internal control procedures that the issuer has implemented, or will <br /> implement, to ensure that the proceeds of the proposed debt issuance will be <br /> directed to the intended use. <br /> The 2017 Debt Management Policy incorporated the City's previous debt policies and <br /> added the areas related to debt management that SB 1029 requires but were not <br /> included in the City's previous debt policies. <br /> Since 2017, GFOA has developed a recommended debt management policy and S&P <br /> developed its FMA methodology. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> As previously stated, the proposed revised Debt Management Policy includes the <br /> previous policies regarding issuing and managing debt including (1) delegation of <br /> authority of the financing team selection to the Finance Director, (2) the types of debt <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.