2 ATTACHMENT 5-7 - Laserfiche WebLink

From: To: en a muren Cc: Subject: Re: easanton Dratt TIE report Io ] Date: Wednesday, December 1, 20212:53:38 PM Ms. Holmgren, I have not received a response from staff or Lisa Wise Consultants regarding my prior comments on the proposed governmental constraints. Here are two more governmental constraints I propose for inclusion in Pleasanton's housing element: 1) impact fees: excluding k-12 impact fees, Pleasanton impact fees are over $85k per door for apartments. Does staff or Lisa Wise Consultants consider this to be a governmental constraint on housing development? If not, why not? 2) backfill use of affordable housing fees: I understand that Pleasanton currently waives select impact fees for affordable housing developments. Rather than waive the revenue off the books, they use affordable housing impact fees collected on market -rate developments to backfill capital infrastructure and demand management fees. Affordable housing impact fees should be used to provide grants and loans to support the development of affordable housing within Pleasanton through a Notice of Funding Availability for non-profit housing developers to use on identified low-income RHNA sites. Thank you, Derek Sageholn On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:23 PM Ellen Holmgren wrote: Dear Derek Sagehorn, Thank you for your email regarding Item No. 13 on the City Council Agenda for Tuesday, October 19, 2021. This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the Mayor and City Council, the City Manager, and City staff. Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton.