Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Jennifer Hagen <br />From: <br />Sent:Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:15 AM <br />To:Jennifer Hagen <br />Subject:Housing Sites - Site #16 - Tri Valley Inn - Keep as Commerical Zone, Remove from Site List <br />Hi Jennifer, <br /> <br />I'm a resident at , my property is adjacent to Site #16 - Tri-Valley Inn. <br />I have lived in Pleasanton 40+ years, 33 years in current home. Half of the north <br />side of site #16, backs-up to my property. <br /> <br />I'm concerned about Site #16 - Tri-Valley Inn, being included in Housing Committee <br />recommended site list. Tri-Valley Inn was on prior housing list, 5 to 7 years ago, <br />I might be off on date range, but it was on list, and was removed by prior committee/council. <br />I believe the final reason for removal from list was "to many units for 2.47 acres". <br />Prior list was for 42 units. <br /> <br />Today, housing committee is recommending site again, with MORE units range 30 - 60 range. <br />Final documents read 50 units. <br /> <br />Final Scoring Documents:Tri-Valley Inn Site #16 <br />6.a) "grade a 1" for higher destiny housing sites, assuming three story, ... will be no more than 1 story than <br />the average number of stories of all adjacent residential development <br />My response concern = 6 properties (estimate) are adjacent to site #16 4 properties 1 story and 2 are 2 story. <br />4 of the 6 adjacent properties (including Mission Plaza) are 1 story <br /> <br />Why remove Site #16 - Tri-Valley Inn <br /> <br /> Increased traffic on Santa Rita Rd - already #1 congested area in Pleasanton <br /> School(s) traffice significant in area <br /> Architecture proposed will not fit adjacent community <br /> Santa Rita Road/Valley area already has 7 or more properties(apartments/Condos0 that fit state <br />requirements. Why more in this area,shouldn't city consider spreading <br />housing requirements, throughout city. <br /> Site #16 - is very similar to Site #26 - St. Augustine - residential three sides = which was removed from list <br /> Mission Plaza & Valley Plaza removed from list - Tri-Valley same corridor <br /> Tri-Valley Inn - is 1 of 2 hotels within 1/2 - 3/4 mile of downtown - why remove available rooms? <br /> 50 units proposed is 1.4% of Housing requirement (3,486), certainly other site options, with potential more units <br /> Site #16 - Tri-Valley should remain commercial - allows more options for future business - office, restaurants, etc.. <br /> Personally I identified 8 sites on list, for a total of 3,665, With-out site #16 - Tri-Valley Inn included. <br /> Hacienda (north corridor) has plenty of housing sites and fits many of the state requirements. <br /> <br />Please remove site #16 from possible site list, or minimum keep zone as business/commercial. Minimum switch <br />classification to "low destiny". <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />Briqn and Judy Casey <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Click here to report this email as spam.