12 ATTACHMENTS 1-2 - Laserfiche WebLink

more preferred or favorable in the overall ranking of sites. Note that the list below reflects a aeneralized order of preference, but due to the fact that the factors are more subjective in nature. this should not be considered a strict ranking, and staff acknowledaes that adiustments could be made based on other preferences, considerations or concerns: • Sites within Hacienda Business Park: o Site 29: Oracle o Site 9: Metro580 o Site 7: Hacienda Terrace o Site 5: Laborer Council o Site 8. Muslim Community Center • Site 6: Signature Center • Site 14: St. Elizabeth Seton3 • Site 2: Stoneridge Mall • Site 25: PUSD District Office • Site 19: Black Avenue • Site 3: PUSD Donlon • Site 16: Tri -Valley Inn • Site 21: Kiewit • Site 24: Sonoma Drive • Site 23: Sunol Blvd • Site 15: Rheem Drive Area • Site 27: PUSD Vineyard • Site 22: Merritt • Site 1: Lester • Site 20: Boulder Court • Site 10: Valley Care • Site 11: Old Santa Rita Road • Site 4: Owens Drive Sites • Site 13: Pimlico Drive (North) The above list, comprising the majority of sites, is recommended to be carried forward into the CEQA analysis, meaning the following sites are suggested to be removed from the initial list: • Site 12: Pimlico Drive (South) — 40 Units: This site is developed with a popular local grocery, and abuts single-family residential uses immediately to the south, making it less suitable for higher -density development. As such, and with a relatively small yield of units, this site appears less suitable than the properties to the north of Pimlico Drive for residential development. • Sites 17 Mission Plaza and #18: Vallev Plaza — (67 units and 220 units. respectively) for a total of 287 units): Each of these sites are filled with small businesses, many of which have served the city for many years. These two centers are also more centrally located within the city where local services and amenities within the center are needed. Based on 3 Since the prior agenda report was published, staff has heard affirmative interest from the Archdiocese and the Catholic Community of Pleasanton (CCOP) regarding housing on the two church properties (St. Elizabeth Seton and St. Augustine Church). Although, as noted below, staff has some reservations about the St. Augustine site, this support helps to elevate the St. Elizabeth Seton site in consideration. Housing Element Update Planning Commission 12 of 14