Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br />Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 <br /> <br />80 <br />18 Tribal Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural <br />resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural <br />landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred <br />place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: <br />a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California <br />Register of Historical Resources, or in a <br />local register of historical resources as <br />defined in Public Resources Code section <br />5020.1(k), or □ □ ■ □ <br />e. A resource determined by the lead agency, <br />in its discretion and supported by <br />substantial evidence, to be significant <br />pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision <br />(c) of Public Resources Code Section <br />2024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in <br />subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code <br />Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall <br />consider the significant of the resource to a <br />California Native American tribe? □ □ ■ □ <br />a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural <br />resource, defined in a Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, <br />cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, <br />sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe and that is listed <br />or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of <br />historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code § 5020.1 (k)? <br />b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural <br />resource, defined in a Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, <br />cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, <br />sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe and that is a <br />resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, <br />to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section <br />2024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section <br />5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significant of the resource to a California Native <br />American tribe? <br />On October 20, 2021, the 12 following Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)-identified <br />local Native American tribal groups were formally notified that the City initiated environmental <br />review of the CAP 2.0 and were invited to provide consultation: