18 - Laserfiche WebLink

The City can explore if allowing for connections to power at the City's streetlights is an option —this would allow the power to feed directly to the parklets from the City streetlights. However, this will require load calculations of the streetlights, determination of how these connections will be provided, and an in-depth review by the Operations Services Department. Retrofit or modification of the streetlights might be needed to allow for connections to be safely made. This type of evaluation may be a future Capital Improvement Project (CIP) to properly budget for the evaluation and modifications. The Planning Commission suggested that staff identify some models of solar or battery- powered lights that would be acceptable as part of the pre-approved design. The Commission generally supported further investigating the feasibility of connecting to existing streetlights, though noted the priority should be to finalize the pre-approved design and get businesses operating in parklets with the lighting project to follow (particularly since the CIP project may take several months to complete). The Commission also inquired if staff would consider adding an annual fee for use of City electricity. This approach is taken by other communities. For example, Livermore charges $40 fee for use of its City electricity in their "flex spaces" on First Street. Other Considerations In addition to location, size, and design standards, staff outlined several additional operational considerations as detailed in Attachment 1. There was not much discussion with the Planning Commission around these considerations as the provisions generally outline sections of the Code that already exist (e.g., complying with the noise ordinance, hours of operation, etc.). Maintenance The City's Operations Services Department actively maintains the public right-of-way including some utilities, the streets, and trees within the right-of-way. The City recommends several provisions be built into either the Parklet Program Guidelines and/or Parklet Agreement to address this necessary maintenance, as described in Attachment 1. Parklets would not be allowed to impede access to utility manholes and access points, and periodically would be asked to be placed out of use (though not moved) to allow for annual tree-trimming to occur.' The provisions are critical to ensure the City can properly maintain the right-of-way moving forward. The Planning Commission was supportive of the maintenance provisions and appreciated their inclusion in the program. Permit Process Staff identified a permit process (similar to the City's Outdoor Dining Permit process) that would require a Parklet Permit, Encroachment Permit, and Parklet Agreement. The Parklet Agreement would outline the expectations of the applicant regarding on-going The Operations Services Department typically conducts downtown tree maintenance over the course of approximately one month each year;the parklet program would provide a standard time during which tree trimming would occur, during which businesses would need to keep the parklet free of people and furniture to avoid damage or risk of injury. Page 5 of 8