CCMIN 09072021 - Laserfiche WebLink

$140,000 for the two-year contract term, and option to extend this contract for three additional one-year terms with a not -to -exceed annual maximum of $70,000 Operations Services 10. Approved and authorized City Manager to execute a purchase order with National Auto Fleet in the amount of $314,586 including a 15% contingency for the purchase of two F-350 trucks and one F-550 truck for Operations Services 11. Approved and authorized City Manager to execute a purchase order with Peterson Cat in the amount of $176,748 for the purchase of a construction backhoe 12. Public Hearing — Introduced and waived first reading of Ordinance No. 2221 to amend Municipal Code Chapter 9.30 Water Management Plan to reflect previously adopted Water Shortage Contingency Plan update from the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan and make other minor adjustments Mayor Brown opened the public comment on the consent calendar. Jill Buck expressed support for item 12 and was only concerned if it was pulled from the agenda. Olivia Sanwong expressed support for item 12 and encouraged a future public discussion of the item as the plan talks about water conservation, water demands, future population growth, climate change, and drought mitigation. She is focused on is how water usage is managed at City parks and believes there is some room for improvement in Pleasanton. Mayor Brown reported many City parks are irrigated with recycled water including Ken Mercer Sports Park, Pleasanton Tennis Park, and Val Vista Park. Mayor Brown closed public comment. MOTION: It was m/s by Balch/Narum to approve the Consent Calendar except Item 5 as recommended and as noted. Motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Narum, Testa, Mayor Brown Noes: None Absent: None Councilmember Balch requested the City Council continue item 5 or reconsider the time period of one year. He advised the item is a cap on food delivery services of 15%. He reported speaking with a few food service delivery representatives and learned restaurants may choose at their option to increase the fee they pay beyond 15% so they can leverage advertisement or other services provided. He requested language which states if the food delivery provider provides a 15% option, but the restaurant chooses a higher percentage at their own discretion they would not be out of compliance with the ordinance. In response to Councilmember Balch, City Attorney Sodergren clarified changes could be made at this meeting and brought back for another meeting. City Attorney Sodergren clarified the way the ordinance works as adopted in the first reading is that it is only enforced by the restaurants if they choose to enforce it via civil action. If the restaurants are opposed to having a food delivery service charge more than 15%, they can take action on their own using the ordinance as a tool. The City does either enforce the ordinance City Council Minutes Page 3 of 16 September 7, 2021