|
Table 3: Development Standards Overview
<br /> NSSP Proposed
<br /> Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 31 Lot 42
<br /> Lot Size 8, 000 sq.ft. 8,350 sq.ft. 8,350 sq.ft. 16,726 sq.ft. 27,423 sq.ft
<br /> (min.)
<br /> Lot Width varies 66 ft. 66 ft. 66 ft. 171.58 ft.
<br /> (min.)
<br /> Lot Depth varies 129 ft. 129 ft. 129 ft. 140 ft. (avg.)
<br /> (min.)
<br /> Setbacks
<br /> (min.)
<br /> Front 25 ft. 25 ft. 40 ft
<br /> Side 5 ft. on one side 10 ft. on one side 40 ft on one side
<br /> 30 ft. combined 25 ft. combined 105 ft combined
<br /> Rear 25 ft. 25 ft. 35 ft.
<br /> Height 30 ft 30 ft. n/a
<br /> (max.)
<br /> FAR3 N/A 40% 7.8%
<br /> 'Lot width for Lot 3 is irregular. This dimension does not include the pan handle piece to the east side of the lot.
<br /> 2 Lot 4 contains the existing residence.
<br /> 3FAR calculation excludes the first 600 sq.ft. of garage area but includes garage area in excess of 600 sq.ft. and
<br /> all enclosed accessory structures with a solid roof.
<br /> The NSSP requires a minimum combined sideyard setback from PUD-MDR lots to be 30 feet.
<br /> The NSSP also states the setbacks and height provide "...only general guidance since the
<br /> PUD classification allows consideration of site-specific issues." (Page 33 of NSSP). As
<br /> proposed, the project would deviate from the above requirement as the proposed combined
<br /> sideyard setbacks for all three new lots would be 25 feet, not meeting the required minimum
<br /> combined side yard setback of 30 feet.
<br /> The existing lots on the southside of Diamond Court across from the project site are not
<br /> located within NSSP area. These lots were approved as part of PUD-88-15 and the
<br /> development standards follow those of the R-1-6,500 district. As such the combined sideyard
<br /> setback for those lots are 12 feet for an interior lot and 15 feet for a corner lot.
<br /> The NSSP does not have specific requirements for lot width or depth. Figure 8 shows the
<br /> approximate lot width and depth of existing properties on Diamond Court as a comparison. As
<br /> shown, the width of the existing lots across from the project site ranges from 53 feet to 80 feet
<br /> with an average width of 67.6 feet, and the depth of the existing lots ranges from 110 feet to
<br /> 131 feet. As proposed, Lots 1 and 2 would have a lot width of 66 feet and depth of 129.24
<br /> feet, which are comparable to the existing lot dimensions. As for Lot 3, due to the "pan handle"
<br /> option, it would have a wider lot width and a deeper lot depth than Lots 2 and 3. As such, in
<br /> staff's view, the proposed lot width is comparable to those of nearby lots in the neighborhood.
<br /> Discussion Question No. 2: Would the Planning Commission consider allowing flexibility in the
<br /> combined side yard setbacks and support the proposed development standards?
<br /> PUD-137, 375 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 11 of 15
<br /> of 2
<br />t7 0,1 . ... t9 4 r
<br /> V- rt'A`s. '.4•1•-•...-sl. heibi. , 445.46. . tvfk - ft. 4,-
<br /> e•
<br /> t4,"V. • ., ...e. . 1
<br /> -1.- „56.. ,41:31•Piic:1::' it gt.
<br /> r: 1\41; t.o4 ' b v,.• N A 6.\,cok. -,%- ire P
<br /> „,..:A.”-:-.•(.*...t,.. illu:...- li .4.8a; ittti pitIAL51-4.:01,7;--14- -z. (..5s '4:1'1' . .7....4"1/r. -412 •'''''';:: (*wt.,'
<br /> • .... .3
<br /> 411
<br /> • ging'erVI • %\t;''
<br /> til 3.
<br /> 4-4 .07. lie4 .1) 44- •
<br /> ' c:f.c.) z x t• ii .
<br /> ie PIAR(.3.1 11
<br /> t .. ,.$ , ,...",,,t1:,. -4, ' '?r!'• '. .#e di •uj' 1; 0:11 11
<br /> tr... za. cli• ,.,... . 126* e:t4,104.,- z FM ,::2.510 6.K.44ve ..r• „n•et.' .r---3 7-
<br /> A.
<br /> L.0 16.o6• •
<br /> "- ,...iaraf--LEL. I i-LI.ZliCe ottD•14' '.:01$01"-
<br /> •* fl
<br /> "Z S A f 3 . OMOM4 44
<br /> CD
<br /> . .
<br /> i
<br /> Ser
<br /> . V
<br /> •C 4- . ... .
<br /> 41,*-ni t 1101 1444 t ts k t rii -' .c:;.0 PAR C E i 7 ; _1
<br /> 4..'•
<br /> PARCEL P.1
<br /> I Cr.510 ...
<br /> k W4 ill
<br /> •f:
<br /> y Its
<br /> PM
<br /> Ii; 1
<br /> rA RiIi_ E3 1j 1. ..),, -"TT.)"NI ;:.'.f7.•![....? o , 1 i.1 .. .. 5
<br /> t V Vi
<br /> • )
<br /> RECOrIDERS MEMO ---.}
<br /> LENBILITY FOR NICPORt,ING MD
<br /> CPPY1')G tifh•APSFACrOry Pi .1 POHTION
<br /> nt 71.IC I 1-.. t III. 1,1 ll' ,, ..• ",-,-,...•... ft
<br />
|