Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> The State's opening meeting law, the Brown Act, generally requires that all meetings <br /> of the City Council, Council subcommittees, City Commissions and City Committees, <br /> be open and public. Any member of the public is allowed to attend and address the <br /> public body. Existing law only allows for teleconferencing in limited circumstances. <br /> With the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor declared a state of emergency in <br /> California, and a local emergency was declared in the City of Pleasanton. The <br /> Governor suspended some open meeting and teleconferencing requirements to allow <br /> for virtual meetings. The City shifted to a virtual meeting format, using Zoom, for the <br /> meetings of the City Council, council subcommittees, commissions and committees. <br /> New State law, AB 361, effective October 1, 2021, requires that the City adopt <br /> findings regarding social distancing and public health in order to be able to continue <br /> with virtual public meetings. The relevant guidance of the Centers for Disease Control <br /> and Prevention and Alameda County Department of Public Health discuss pre- <br /> screening persons sharing indoor spaces, social distancing between persons (even if <br /> masked) when indoors, and minimizing time in shared indoor spaces, particularly <br /> when persons are speaking in loud voices or when they are projecting their voices. AB <br /> 361 further requires that the City Council re-adopt such findings about social <br /> distancing and public health in support of virtual meetings every 30 days. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The City Council has changed from all virtual meetings to a modified in-person City <br /> Council meeting format where Councilmembers, staff and participants have provided <br /> proof of vaccination status in order to attend in person, or have otherwise been pre- <br /> screened for symptoms, and generally wear masks unless speaking. However, <br /> members of the public, project applicants, or other interested persons may still <br /> participate virtually. It is recommended that City Council meetings continue to allow for <br /> virtual participation to protect the public health and maintain social distancing. <br /> Council subcommittees remain meeting virtually because the City meeting room where <br /> subcommittee meetings previously were held has been re-purposed for staff offices in <br /> order to provide for social distancing for staff health and safety. It is proposed that <br /> Council subcommittees continue to meet virtually for such social distancing reasons. <br /> City commissions and committees range in size from five (5) to twenty-two (22) <br /> members, plus staff and members of the public in attendance. Such commissions and <br /> committees are in meeting rooms which do not provide for adequate social distancing <br /> for a multi-hour indoor setting (where most do not have microphones such that persons <br /> need to project their voices to be heard by the group). It is proposed that commissions <br /> and committees also continue to meet virtually for such social distancing reasons. <br /> The proposed resolution provides for findings regarding social distancing and public <br /> health arising from the COVID-19 pandemic which support the continuation of virtual <br /> public City meetings. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />