My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 07202021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 07202021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2021 4:54:51 PM
Creation date
9/22/2021 4:54:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
landfills sources of methane, maximize the life of landfills, and transform that organic waste into <br /> compost, bio-fuel, and electricity. <br /> Ms. Griffiths advised the City's requirements are focused on the specific program implementation. She <br /> advised SB 1383 also sets the goal of 20% recovery of edible food by 2025. She provided a brief <br /> overview of implementation timelines and stated the City has been proactively working toward <br /> compliance. The draft October 2017 regulations were incorporated into the agreement with Pleasanton <br /> Garbage Service (PGS) and the current franchise agreement will need to be updated. <br /> Regulations are effective January 1, 2022. All programs need to be in place including ordinances, <br /> franchise agreements, and collection systems, and CalReycle can begin assessing penalties against <br /> jurisdictions for not implementing these programs. January 1, 2024 is when the City will need to start <br /> assessing penalties for non-compliant entities in the City such as generators, haulers, and processors. <br /> Ms. Griffiths reported SB 1383 requires monitoring and enforcement by the City. A key requirement is <br /> that the City needs to pass enforceable mechanisms to mandate compliance with the SB 1383 <br /> programs. A draft ordinance will be presented to City Council later this summer or early fall for <br /> consideration. The bill also requires annual education and outreach to generators which is key to <br /> creating successful programs and making people aware before rollout and on an ongoing basis. <br /> SB 1383 requires robust record-keeping and reporting including producing an initial Jurisdiction <br /> Compliance Report, annual reports, and the ongoing maintenance of a Centralized Implementation <br /> Record that CalRecycle can request access within 10 days. She noted it is important to use an <br /> integrated system and use of a software platform is recommended to help ease the record-keeping, <br /> reporting coordination, and making it accessible to the different parties that need to see it. <br /> The costs of SB 1383 are significant and are one of the key factors in the Action Plan along with <br /> negotiations with PGS regarding impact to rates. Ms. Griffiths advised the City is actively tracking <br /> current legislation in the 2021 session related to SB 1383. SB 619 does not change the implementation <br /> date of SB 1383 but prevents CalRecycle from issuing penalties to jurisdictions during the first year of <br /> implementation if the jurisdiction made a reasonable effort towards compliance. <br /> Councilmember Narum suggested City Manager Fialho or Assistant Hopkins work with the City's <br /> lobbyist on a trailer bill. Assistant Hopkins advised this was contemplated and part of the role-making. <br /> Ms. Griffiths advised there are existing protections both on the federal level and within the State level <br /> which is the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 2017. It provides protections for food <br /> generators for donation to edible food recovery organizations. She noted the food recovery <br /> organizations do not have to accept donations that are not edible for human consumption. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant Hopkins clarified that implementation of the SB 1383 <br /> ordinance will be a countywide and will supersede the Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (MRO). The <br /> staff time and funds going towards the MRO will now be focused on SB 1383. She reported staff has <br /> been working with StopWaste staff for almost two years on how they can support the local jurisdictions. <br /> She noted there may be some additional costs when the program is underway and the City could use <br /> some of its Measure D funding, or StopWaste could ask the jurisdictions, or the board could decide to <br /> reallocate resources internally. <br /> Assistant Hopkins reported SB 1383 does not by its nature trigger a requirement to expand an <br /> enclosure. There are some nuances with townhomes where there is individual service versus an <br /> apartment or multi-family that have joint service through enclosures. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Assistant Hopkins noted the enforcement and record-keeping will <br /> require a full-time person, in-house person, and noted that is why it is so important to have a software <br /> program in place. She noted the City will continue to provide the enforcement. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 14 July 20, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.