My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 07202021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 07202021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2021 4:54:51 PM
Creation date
9/22/2021 4:54:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The new default will take effect January 1, 2022. Moving to Renewable 100 for residential and <br /> commercial accounts will lower citywide emissions by 8% according and bring the City closer to <br /> achieving its 2030 GHG emissions reduction goals. <br /> The monthly premium of Renewable 100 is approximately $5 for residents, $15 for small businesses, <br /> $160 for medium-sized businesses, and $2500 for most large businesses. Staff will partner with EBCE <br /> to tailor outreach to customers who may be disproportionately impacted by higher energy costs and <br /> develop outreach strategies focused on helping residents and businesses opt down to Bright Choice. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Management Analyst Reda confirmed this does not alter the <br /> ability to provide residents uninterrupted power as it is being delivered by PG&E. If there is a <br /> transmission problem from Oregon to California it will still affect Pleasanton no matter what option is <br /> chosen. He advised the 100% renewable option would mean Pleasanton is injecting 100% renewable <br /> onto the grid for all its customers. It does not necessarily mean what is going through the power lines is <br /> all 100% renewable energy for Pleasanton but is counted for greenhouse gas emission purposes. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Alex Digiorgio of EBCE, advised there is no limit to the number of <br /> times customers can change among EBCE options and noted it usually takes two billing cycles to <br /> implement the request. The only caveat is when people opt-out from PG&E's terms and conditions; <br /> after the first 60 days of service there is a one-year waiting period before returning to EBCE. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Management Analyst Reda reported all EBCE customers <br /> generate credits for their solar, and if they generate more than they use they receive a check in April if <br /> their credit is over $100; if it is under $100 it is usually carried over. Solar customers are paying one <br /> cent more per kilowatt-hour for their electricity to be on Renewable 100 but are also selling their <br /> electricity at one cent more per kilowatt-hour back to the grid. <br /> Mr. Digiorgio explained the Resilient Home program is for residential customers that comprises a solar <br /> plus battery storage on individual homes that allow customers to operate off the grid. The solar panels <br /> charge the battery and if the grid goes down they have a fully charged battery to deploy. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Mr. Digiorgio confirmed there is a substantial price tag with solar but the <br /> rebate for participating in the program is a little more than $1200. He also advised there is the Self- <br /> Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) run by the State and the goal of this program is to make solar as <br /> affordable as possible. <br /> Mayor Brown expressed concern that residents are being asked again to select a new renewable <br /> option but has not heard the reasoning why the City cannot maintain Brilliant 100. <br /> Mr. Digiorgio explained there is a resource constraint and is not a cost-effective option. Brilliant 100 <br /> relies heavily on large hydroelectricity and noted it does not qualify as a renewable resource by <br /> California law but is considered carbon-free. However, he advised in the era of a mega drought and the <br /> effects of climate change, those hydroelectric facilities are producing a lot less energy. He advised <br /> another factor on the resource side is nuclear power; EBCE's Board decided not to accept that option. <br /> Mayor Brown opened public comment. <br /> Becky Dennis expressed support for Option 1 and noted the Renewable 100 program as a cost- <br /> effective way to meet the City's climate action goals. She inquired as to how many solar panel systems <br /> exist on Pleasanton's rooftops and if the City should credit its carbon account with the power generated <br /> by these systems as permitted land use as these privately owned systems also reduce Pleasanton's <br /> carbon footprint. <br /> Mr. Digiorgio reported there are slightly over 4000 solar panel systems in Pleasanton. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 12 of 14 July 20. 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.