My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
092121
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 11:19:00 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 11:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGFUO - Public comments provided to the Planning Commission for the July 28, 2021, meeting <br />Please Reject Main Street Retail Mandate <br />On July 28, 2021 the Pleasanton Planning Commission is set to consider a proposal by <br />the Planning Staff to require that the front 60% of all Main Street buildings be genuine <br />retail. The retail mandate just started recently with the newly adapted Downtown <br />Specific Pian in 2018, which required that the front 25% of Main Street buildings be <br />retail ("active first floor use" in planner talk, which includes restaurants.} <br />So, why not up the retail mandate to 60%? Main Street cannot support the kind and <br />quantity of retail the Planners are proposing to require. The building spaces are too <br />small, the parking is far way, and there are not enough customers to support that much <br />retail on Main Street. Instead of increased vitality, we will get empty buildings and <br />struggling businesses -- the opposite of vitality. <br />When City Council discussed the possibility of upping the retell mandate to 60% In early <br />June, several Council members pointed out that the 25% retail mandate has only been <br />around for a year and half, during covid, during which many building owners have lost <br />tenants, forgiven rent, and are having trouble renting spaces. <br />The Planners proposed mandatory retail in 1993, 2001, and 2009. In each case the <br />Pleasanton Downtown Association opposed the mandate, and City Council rejected the <br />mandate. This was a downtown, not a shopping center. <br />Between 1994 and 2004 retail sales in Downtown doubled — without a retail mandate — <br />because the City spent on widened sidewalks for Main Street, and opened sidewalk <br />dining, which brought customers Downtown, especially later in the day, which led to <br />more retail sales. <br />The 201 B Downtown Specific Plan also prohibits banks on Main Street. For many years <br />the Planners required that banks had to have a branch in downtown. Now many <br />buildings are adapted to banking and occupied by banks. Banks bring customers <br />Downtown every day, which helps our struggling retail stores. <br />The Pleasanton Planners have not noticed that nationwide retail space is substantially <br />overbuilt, and often vacant. Small retail specialty stores, of the kind that could fit into <br />the undersized building spaces with inadequate parking in Downtown, have been <br />savaged by the increase in ecommerce, like by Amazon. <br />The Planning Commission will have made their recommendation by the time this <br />column is printed, but City Council makes the final decision. I suggest that City Council <br />please leave the retail mandate at only 25%, and see if that helps or hurts Downtown <br />vitality. We do not need more empty buildings and strugglinq businesses on Main <br />Street. <br />Peter MacDonald 7-24-2021 <br />Distributed to City Council for the September 7, 2021, meeting Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.