My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
092121
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 11:19:00 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 11:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGFUO - Public comments submitted for the June 1, 2021, City Council Meeting <br />From: Herb Ritter <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 20214:15 PM <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />Subject: Comments regarding Item 17, 6-1-2021 CC Agenda - Mandatory Retail Requirement <br />Hello Honorable Mayor and Council, <br />As a past member of the Downtown Specific Plan Task Force and past member of the Planning <br />Commission, we have had lots of discussion about Active Ground Floor use on Mainstreet. We all want <br />more, but in my opinion, we can't as a Govt entity Zone our way into mandating only "true retailers" in a <br />shopping district is like building a bird house for passenger pigeons. Won't matter how pretty it is, they <br />still will not stay. For example, look at some of our beautiful buildings down town that show for sale or <br />Lease. Also please consider the following: <br />Now is NOT THE TIME to "Over Regulate". The intention of offering the 25% floor space <br />ordinance for Retail by the DTSP was to ensure we were supporting Retail "Active Use" for <br />businesses that wanted to front Mainstreet and not to have vacant spaces. The challenge was <br />we did not specify that the Retail portion of the business, must have a separate Business License <br />and Operate as a retailer should with hours and online sales. Now days the word "Retail" should <br />mean many things. <br />The City zoning in my opinion just need to focus on "Active Use" and not get hung up on the <br />word "Retail." <br />I am not in favor of increasing the retail "Mandated" Space to 60% or we may have a bunch of <br />empty buildings. Rather, city Govt need to create the infrastructure and application processes <br />to make it attractive for business and building owners to invest in our downtown which will <br />foster legitimate "active use" business.. We need to allow businesses that has a customer, a <br />patient, a student, gym, yoga studies, a product to sell and all must have an active "specific" <br />active use business license with the city to operate it. <br />Please focus on any changes to remove regulations and obstructions to make it possible for business to <br />create "Active Uses" that our residents can enjoy on Mainstreet. The Good Businesses will prevail, and <br />the others will pivot to something different. <br />Thank you for your service. <br />Herb Ritter <br />(cell) 925-_ <br />Distributed to City Council for the September 7, 2021, meeting Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.