Laserfiche WebLink
as demonstrated by the "front -facing" and visible business operation, a point-of-sale <br />mechanism, and business hours that are generally consistent with retail and restaurant uses. <br />Additionally, several members of the Chamber expressed that a personal service use may <br />create foot traffic equal to or greater than a retail or restaurant establishment and should be <br />considered as an active use. A member of the Chamber also commented that signage for a <br />non-active use that shares a tenant space with an active use should be secondary in size <br />compared to the signage for an active use. Finally, members of both groups expressed that <br />where an active use and a non-active use share a tenant space, that they both be required to <br />obtain separate business licenses. Written correspondence with comments received as of the <br />publication of this agenda report is included as Exhibit C. <br />DRAFT REDLINE CHANGES <br />Following the presentations to the Pleasanton Downtown Association and the Chamber of <br />Commerce, staff composed draft changes to the DSP and PMC, which are summarized by <br />topic below. Exhibit A to this agenda report shows the actual language of the proposed <br />changes to the DSP and the PMC. <br />Draft chanoes to definition of Active Ground Floor Use <br />Staff proposes amendments to the definition of "Active Ground Floor Use" to better articulate it <br />intent. Additional language has been added to indicate that active uses are those that attract <br />walk-in customers. And, language proposed in the DSP would indicate that uses that are <br />subject to the AGFUO are required to follow the procedures for zoning certificate approval <br />outlined in the PMC. <br />Although some members of the Chamber of Commerce suggested personal services be <br />treated as an active use, staff does not support making this change, since it was a deliberate <br />and explicit policy decision to exclude such businesses from the definition at the time the DSP <br />was adopted. Staff notes that this exclusion is reflected in the PMC's definition, but not in the <br />DSP, and so proposes to add this to the DSP for consistency. <br />The draft changes to the definition of active ground -floor use are shown in PMC Section <br />18.08.017; the procedures for zoning certificate approval are identified in a new section, PMC <br />Section 18.81.040, which is also discussed further below. <br />LD -P.18, Active Ground Floor Use Requirements for Multi -Use Spaces <br />The draft changes proposed to Policy LD -P.18 consist of the following; <br />Increase in the depth required for active uses in multi -use spaces such that at least 60 <br />percent (instead of the current 25 percent) of the depth of the tenant space is dedicated <br />to an active use.2 The depth is measured perpendicular to Main Street, which remains <br />consistent with the existing policy language. <br />• Add a requirement that at least 60 percent of the total square footage of the tenant <br />space be dedicated to the active use. <br />2 Staffs recommendation is for 60% of the depth and 60% of the square footage, although a variety of other <br />options also exist, such as 50% or 75%. <br />Active Ground Floor Use Overlay Planning Commission <br />3 of 5 <br />