My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
092121
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 10:24:26 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 10:22:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
05 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT B
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\092121
05 ATTACHMENTS 2-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\092121
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
as Attachment 4c. At the time this report was published, staff has not received any public <br />comments. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration adopted by the City Council for RZ-97-2 in conformance <br />with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There are not <br />substantial changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is being <br />undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially <br />increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new <br />information of substantial importance which was unknown at the time the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council regarding the project or its <br />effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any previously identified effects or impacts <br />are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated into <br />the project's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of approval. <br />Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this agenda report. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal and found the proposed <br />density, development standards, architecture, site design, lot configuration, and <br />landscaping are consistent with the Zoning, and General Plan goals and policies <br />including all regulations and design guidelines. The Planning Commission also found <br />that the architectural style and design of the new home was appropriate for the area. <br />Therefore, the Planning Commission recommended approval. <br />Submitted by: <br />Ellen Clark <br />Director of Community <br />Community Development <br />Fiscal Review: <br />Tina Olson <br />Director of Finance <br />Approved y: <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br />Attachments: <br />1. Draft City Council Ordinance for PUD Development Plan (PUD -140) <br />a. Exhibit A, Draft Conditions of Approval <br />b. Exhibit B, Project Plans <br />2. Draft City Council Resolution for Growth Management Allocation <br />3. Draft City Council Resolution for Minor Subdivision <br />4. July 14, 2021 Planning Commission Agenda Report <br />5. July 14, 2021 Planning Commission Approved Minute Excerpt <br />Page 9 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.