My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_August 25, 2021
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
09-22
>
_Minutes_August 25, 2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2021 11:03:39 AM
Creation date
9/15/2021 11:03:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nibert preferred to retain criteria 6c as is. Ms. Clark mentioned that was a <br /> comment from Housing Commission. <br /> Chair Brown asked if the Commission had input on comments related to the public comments <br /> received from Ms. Combs. He then inquired whether the Commission had any thoughts related <br /> to rezoning and stated he felt strongly about vacant lots. He noted correspondence he had <br /> received suggesting priority for sites with existing General Plan designations for housing. Ms. <br /> Clark stated the majority of sites would likely require a General Plan amendment or rezoning of <br /> sites, so this may not be a useful criterion. <br /> Commissioner Allen moved to recommend approval of the draft housing selection <br /> criteria with modifications including: (1) Item 2, to add an additional point and category <br /> related to the distance from BART to include one-third mile, one-half mile and three- <br /> quarters mile; (2) Item 4e would bundle the four natural hazard items into one point and <br /> if the property does not have any of those hazards it would receive one point; (3) Item 7, <br /> change category name and add Item b, related to one point if a parcel is vacant or <br /> underutilized; (4) adding to Housing Commission recommendations to include: a) <br /> adding one point to being on a recycled water pipe line, b) procedurally, the Director of <br /> Community Development will work with PUSD to ensure appropriate method for <br /> determining over enrollment that extends over a single year, and c) Director of <br /> Community Development and staff will provide definition related to what was currently <br /> defined as `significant tree removal' <br /> Commissioner Nibert seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, Gaidos, Nibert, and Pace <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 7. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> There were no reports from meetings attended. <br /> 8. Actions of the City Council <br /> Ms. Clark provided a brief overview of the items listed in the report. <br /> Chair Brown inquired whether any changes were made to the Greek Resurrection Orthodox <br /> Church item that had previously come before the Planning Commission. Ms. Clark stated it <br /> was presented on the consent calendar and was approved with no modifications. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 10 August 25, 2021 <br />ovide an objective standard here, <br /> since specific tree counts, number of heritage trees would not be known for individual sites. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 10 August 25, 2021 <br />ps a one-third mile radius as a <br /> compromise. Three Commissioners concurred with staff's suggestion, by straw vote. <br /> Sites Criteria (Categories 3) — Proximity to Services and Amenities <br /> Commissioner Allen asked about adding a point for sites near major job centers. Ms. Clark <br /> explained that the data to determine employment numbers for a job center or business park <br /> would be difficult to obtain, and thus did not recommend its inclusion. Commissioner Allen was <br /> amenable to adding that criteria in Round 2. Commissioner Pace stated he was also amenable <br /> to Ms. Clark's recommendation. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 10 August 25, 2021 <br /> She stated the State <br /> recognized that the City should determine the most appropriate locations for housing. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 10 August 25, 2021 <br />irmed there were 600 replies to the housing survey and inquired if any related <br /> to selection criteria. Ms. Clark stated the survey questions offered the opportunity to comment <br /> on preferred and specific locations. Chair Brown suggested the survey results be provided <br /> prior to final decisions. Ms. Clark suggested the criteria be determined based on guiding <br /> principles and the survey results would be available well before the matter comes back before <br /> the Planning Commission. Chair Brown mentioned the Housing Commission's comments and <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10 August 25, 2021 <br />