My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
090721
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2021 9:14:41 AM
Creation date
9/1/2021 9:14:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/7/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
NOTES
ACTIVE GROUND FLOOR USE OVERLAY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that the proposed amendments to the DSP and the PMC are exempt from the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section <br /> 15061(b)(3); and <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution to amend the DSP related to the AGFUO, find the specific plan <br /> amendments consistent with the General Plan, and approve Case P21-0636, <br /> amendments to the DSP as shown in Attachment 1; <br /> 3. Introduce the draft ordinance, find the subject code amendments consistent with the <br /> General Plan, and approve Case P21-0637, amendments to the PMC as shown in <br /> Attachment 2; and <br /> 4. Consider identifying as a future City Council Work Plan item1 an update to the <br /> AGFUO to include personal services as permitted uses after the initial six-month <br /> vacancy period, rather than a broader range of active and non-active uses as is <br /> currently allowed. <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> No fiscal impact to the City or public service is anticipated with the subject amendments <br /> to the DSP and PMC. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> In December 2020, staff received a request to utilize the exceptions identified in the <br /> DSP to locate a non-active use downtown, based on provisions of the policy that allow <br /> for a business occupying a space with a mix of active and non-active uses, to operate.2 <br /> The Director of Community Development denied the request and on appeal, the <br /> Planning Commission considered the request at its February 10, 2021, meeting. The <br /> Planning Commission upheld the appeal, but also suggested the policy in the DSP be <br /> reviewed by City Council, who requested a.discussion be agendized. On June 1, 2021, <br /> the City Council heard public comment and provided direction to staff(see discussion <br /> below). <br /> After the June 1 City Council meeting, staff presented this topic and potential <br /> modifications to the PDA and Chamber of Commerce; comments are outlined below. <br /> Also below is a summary of Planning Commission's discussion and recommendation. <br /> Staff suggests this could be considered as a work plan item for Fiscal Year 2022-23 to provide an <br /> opportunity to apply the AGFUO for a longer period of time, and evaluate conditions"post COVID." <br /> 2 Separately, an application for an exception based on other provisions of the AGFUO, for tenant spaces <br /> vacant for more than six months, was received on April 5, 2021. This application was approved by the <br /> Director of Community Development on April 23, 2021 and was not appealed. <br /> The City received another request for exception on May 18, 2021: a business consisting of personal <br /> services for a vacant tenant space at 560 Main Street. Due to the non-active nature of the use, the <br /> Zoning Administrator denied the Zoning Certificate that would allow the use to occupy the tenant space <br /> on June 7, 2021. This applicant has since re-submitted a revised/updated application, which the Director <br /> of Community Development has determined should be referred to the Planning Commission for a <br /> decision. This item is tentatively scheduled to be heard on September 8, 2021. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.